private and public use of the living room - Bilkent University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The psychological context of the home has been examined by the studies that provide lists of meanings about the concept of home (Cooper, 1974; Hawyard, 1975; Sixsmith, 1986). Although above mentioned studies contributed to the literature with empirical aspects, they are not able to use the previously defined meanings in their original contexts. Besides, they usually use those meanings as if they were universal or generalized. The studies that provide lists of meanings are useful for providing “conceptual basis” and “…a language for talking about the concept of home” (Moore, 2000, p. 210). Another issue in the psychological context of home is that previous studies differentiate between the ideas of home and house. On the one hand, there are studies dealing with home as a “concept and physical entity” which are based mostly on “subjective perceptions of places”, on the other hand, there are studies which are “…concrete empirical studies on house use, housing satisfaction, place attachment and evaluation” dealing with house as being “rooted in the concrete world” (Moore, 2000, p. 211). In addition to placing home in the psychological context, the meaning of home in terms of its relationship with the identity of its dweller should be examined. Cooper (1974) indicates that home can be seen as the symbol of self. Cooper’s study is based on the Jung’s collective unconsciousness theory and claims that; The house therefore nicely reflects how man sees himself, with both an intimate interior, or self as viewed from within and revealed only to those intimates who are invited inside, and public exterior (the persona or mask, in Jungian terms) or the self that we choose to display to others (p. 131). 4
As previously mentioned, Cooper’s (1974) study can not place the meaning of home in its particular context and uses those meanings as if they were universal (Moore, 2000). Another attempt based on contemporary American culture, explore “…the role of dwelling place in the construction of personal, group, temporal, and home identities” (Hummon, 1989, p. 208). Although the factors that affect the relationship between dwelling place and identity were defined, they are not based on an empirical study. Also, they are about the contemporary American culture and cannot be generalized. On the other hand, Lawrence (1987) defines the meaning and use of homes in terms of cultural, socio demographic and psychological dimensions which are linked to a dual historical perspective. Lawrence (1987) categorizes “self- esteem, personal identity, personal space and privacy, aspirations and goals, personal values, personal preferences, personal role(s), residential biography, subjective life stages and domestic symbols” under the psychological dimensions of the meaning and use of home (p. 164). Sixsmith (1996) divides “…home into three modes of experience: the personal home; the social home; the physical home” (p. 281) and defines the characteristics of the personal home as, “…the structure, layout, style, decoration, furnishing, etc., of the home make it a place above any other, where self- expression is possible” (p. 290). The social home is defined as “…not only a place often shared with other people but [is] also a place allowing entertainment and enjoyment of other people’s company such as friends and relatives” (p. 291). The meaning of the physical home is revealed as “…the design and layout, the architectural style, it’s very structure 5
Page 1: PRIVATE AND PUBLIC USE OF THE LIVIN
Page 4 and 5: ÖZET EVLERDE SALONUN ÖZEL VE GENE
Page 6 and 7: TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE ..
Page 8 and 9: LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1. Soggior
Page 10 and 11: Figure 3.23. The relationship betwe
Page 12 and 13: Figure C.29. Photograph of a living
Page 14 and 15: Table B.15. Independent samples t-
Page 16 and 17: home, the understanding of the term
Page 20 and 21: that is imbued with these instances
Page 22 and 23: Besides their meaning as a reflecti
Page 24 and 25: private uses of the living rooms ar
Page 26 and 27: house (Bachelard, 1969). On the oth
Page 28 and 29: Lastly, the modern type of a house
Page 30 and 31: Altman and Gauvain (1981) explain t
Page 32 and 33: Figure 2.5. The living area in trad
Page 34 and 35: 2.3. Living Room as a Reflection of
Page 36 and 37: understanding, clustering and dispe
Page 38 and 39: Table 2.1. Factors affecting the us
Page 40 and 41: 2004). She (2004) also defines anot
Page 42 and 43: The housewife who continually rearr
Page 44 and 45: the house defines the number of roo
Page 46 and 47: of guests occurred in one room. In
Page 48 and 49: The main focus of the study is to e
Page 50 and 51: elements in the living rooms. Activ
Page 52 and 53: Table 3.1. Distribution of age Age
Page 54 and 55: Figure 3.2. Location of Angora Evle
Page 56 and 57: As the research area of the thesis,
Page 58 and 59: Figure 3.6. Basement and ground flo
Page 60 and 61: music, eating, reading newspapers,
Page 62 and 63: The intentions for the interior des
Page 64 and 65: Number of Private Living Room Activ
Page 66 and 67: Frequency of Living Room Use Every
Page 68 and 69:
Number of Houses 18 16 14 12 10 8 6
Page 70 and 71:
Number of Houses Few Days in a Moun
Page 72 and 73:
family rooms, intentions related to
Page 74 and 75:
Therefore, it can be said that the
Page 76 and 77:
activities and hosting guests. In t
Page 78 and 79:
indicates that older respondents sp
Page 80 and 81:
Interestingly, the wife of that res
Page 82 and 83:
The person whose identity is reflec
Page 84 and 85:
25 20 15 10 Aesthetical Objects Exi
Page 86 and 87:
female respondents. Previous studie
Page 88 and 89:
Figure 3.27. Photograph of a Living
Page 90 and 91:
Figure 3.30. Photograph of a living
Page 92 and 93:
Figure 3.33. Photograph of a living
Page 94 and 95:
then the objects in the living room
Page 96 and 97:
espondents designed their living ro
Page 98 and 99:
Cromley, E. C. (1990). Alone togeth
Page 100 and 101:
Rybczynski, W. (1987). Home: A shor
Page 102 and 103:
12- Salonunuzu oluştururken nelerd
Page 104 and 105:
14- What changes do you plan to mak
Page 106 and 107:
Table B.4. Intentions related to fu
Page 108 and 109:
Table B.11. Time spent in the house
Page 110 and 111:
Table B.15. Independent samples t-
Page 112 and 113:
Table B.18. Gender vs. The person w
Page 114 and 115:
Table B.22. Aesthetical objects vs.
Page 116 and 117:
Figure C.4. Photograph of a living
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
show all

private and public use of the living room - Bilkent University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?