29.06.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN

View/Open - ARAN

View/Open - ARAN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

apply an algorithm to colour the data so as the target areas are easily captured.<br />

This is something which was identified by Thomas Knudsen in his 2005 study of<br />

pseudo natural colour aerial imagery for urban and suburban mapping (and in<br />

previous studies by the same author). In his study he suggests an algorithm for<br />

automatic urban and suburban aerial image interpretation. The paper uses test data<br />

from (pseudo) natural color images used in traditional photogrammetry (as<br />

opposed to airborne four channel imagers). His aim is to discriminate between<br />

vegetation and human made materials, which was also one of the aims of this<br />

thesis. The author cites the relative importance of separating vegetation (which he<br />

considers to be void of mapping objects) and human-made materials in respect to<br />

automated photogrammetric mapping. It is worth noting at this point that imagery<br />

captured in the near-infrared band is generally indicative of vegetation and<br />

Knudsen’s work is an attempt to identify this band using only aerial photography<br />

captured using red, green, blue three channel instruments. His work is very<br />

relevant to this thesis as over the course of his study he identifies a method of<br />

obtaining “excellent” (Knudsen, P.2691) reproduction of grey surfaces (which in<br />

an urban area correspond to paving and exposed rock).<br />

The author takes a look at three algorithms in terms of their effectiveness in<br />

discriminating between areas in scanned aerial photograph. The first is a pseudo<br />

natural color algorithm developed by the author in a previous study (Knudsen<br />

2002) where he managed to create a blue channel based on green, red and near<br />

infrared values and left the green and red values as captured. This allowed for<br />

good reproduction of red surfaces (which corresponded to roof surfaces in the<br />

Danish sample data) but suffers slightly from haze effect.<br />

The second algorithm the author considers is one which creates a blue channel<br />

between green and near infrared and a green channel form similar values and<br />

leaves the red as captured. This, similar to the first algorithm, gave good<br />

reproduction of red surfaces and of vegetation, but failed in reproducing clear grey<br />

surfaces. The third algorithm the author considers involved swapping the green<br />

data for blue, the near infrared for green and leaving the red as was. This allowed<br />

him to reproduce grey surfaces accurately (making them stand out in the<br />

156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!