29.06.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN

View/Open - ARAN

View/Open - ARAN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

algorithm” (H. van der Meer & F. van der Meer, P.257), this would seem difficult<br />

to achieve in the case of a relatively chaotic Alaskan wilderness but might be<br />

better applied to peri-urban land parcels.<br />

Another example of a study which combines a number of different aspects of<br />

remote sensing to analyze aerial data in the 2007 random field model for urban<br />

area detection developed by Ping Zhong and Runsheng. In this study the authors<br />

presented a method for interpreting remote images of urban environments that<br />

makes use of what they call “conditional random fields” (Zhong and Wang, 2007).<br />

The study is a response to the fact that although considerable research has been<br />

completed on land cover analysis, the algorithms generally adapt for only a<br />

narrow range of image resolutions and therefore only a few types of urban areas.<br />

They see previous attempts at urban analysis as being based on either gray-level-<br />

based spectral analysis or using texture descriptors. They further note that edge<br />

strength measures can be used to extract homogenous regions. This is an<br />

interesting concept, and may have an application in the automatic capture of large<br />

utility features in rural areas, such as silage pits.<br />

The authors establish a discriminative method for identifying regions in the<br />

photography based on interactions with the neighboring regions. This allows them<br />

to utilize the conditional random fields in terms of context to identify areas. The<br />

authors broke this technique into the jobs of configuring the features, selecting<br />

classifications and classifier fusion. The proposed algorithm compares the fields<br />

against the data segments and places them in a classified segmented model; the<br />

authors compare their results against two previous algorithms, Stacked Feature<br />

Based (where a number of different feature types a re concatenated into one model)<br />

and Straight Line Statistics (where areas of high incidence are used to identify<br />

urban areas). They observed a higher output rate against the first method (based<br />

on time on a 2.4Dhz Pentium machine) and decreased accuracy in detecting<br />

smaller rural areas against the second (where straight line statistics were not<br />

effective against urban areas smaller than 400*400pixels). The method the authors<br />

use, of allowing each component part of the search to train based on “its own<br />

aspects” (Zhong & Wang, 2007) appeared to give positive results against the 60<br />

training and 91 test images used, and was able to successfully identify blocks of<br />

163

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!