29.06.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN

View/Open - ARAN

View/Open - ARAN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.2 Water<br />

Figure 4: Typical Water Area Image<br />

This section took a look at four water samples present in the sample image<br />

(comprising of three sections of lake, and one of river) to see if the spectral values<br />

could be used to control and calibrate image processing of land polygons. The<br />

results were good and indicated several unique properties for this cover that could<br />

be used to calibrate a key in relation to surfaces being studies. The percentage of<br />

the image covered by water was proportionally small but the lake section made up<br />

the biggest single polygon. Of the water, the majority of the polygons were for<br />

was drains, several streams (ranging from three to less than a meter in width<br />

stream), there was also a river and lake present. The streams and drains were<br />

eliminated from the study This was for two reasons; firstly they have very small<br />

width (less than a meter in some cases) and were often obscured by overhanging<br />

vegetation and secondly they are already captured and any spectral analysis would<br />

only be of use as comparative values to use against the rest of the image –which<br />

was not possible due to the vegetation.<br />

Variations between the samples were slight, suggesting that lower flown<br />

photography would be necessary to compile any useful information regarding<br />

sediment levels, but allowing good baseline figures to be derived from the values<br />

present. The pixel value was almost uniformly two thirds less than the image<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!