29.06.2013 Views

View/Open - ARAN

View/Open - ARAN

View/Open - ARAN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

trends of bordering polygons mentioned above was detected and included in the<br />

flagged polygon set, where the histogram could be analyzed.<br />

Shade test sample 2<br />

(Pasture containing small areas of<br />

shade)<br />

76<br />

Mean pixel<br />

value<br />

Standard<br />

deviation<br />

Red 136.056 23.905<br />

Green 179.235 25.065<br />

Blue 114.285 14.684<br />

Table 17: Shade test sample value 2<br />

Although the mean pixel values matched those expected for pasture across the<br />

three colour bands the high level of standard deviation, suggests further<br />

examination could be necessary. A histogram representation shows the relatively<br />

higher pixel count across the values associated with shade but displays a clear<br />

peak for pasture. From the evidence of these samples it would seem safe to set the<br />

tolerance for standard deviation in both the red and green colour bands to a figure<br />

between 25 and 30; where any polygons exceeding this (even if they are bordering<br />

pasture polygons) would be flagged and exported to an examination set together<br />

with appended histograms.<br />

The final part of the testing took a sample from relatively clear pasture (little or no<br />

shade present) to see if the trend identified in the first two samples would continue.<br />

In other words if a large amount of shade resulted in a high pixel count and peak<br />

at the values for shade, and a smaller amount less so then the trend should show a<br />

simple peak for an area with little or no shade present. While this produced<br />

expected results, it was necessary to confirm the trend.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!