Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Marsh test Sample 1<br />
(Pasture)<br />
Mean pixel value Standard Deviation<br />
Red 201.617 8.05<br />
Green 209.713 9.569<br />
Blue 136.645 12.082<br />
Marsh test Sample 2<br />
(Mixed Forestry)<br />
Mean pixel value Standard Deviation<br />
Red 69.22 34.492<br />
Green 103.352 33.620<br />
Blue 86.594 19.885<br />
Marsh test Sample 1<br />
(Paving)<br />
Mean pixel value Standard Deviation<br />
Red 246.167 8.1<br />
Green 252.542 5.4<br />
Blue 206.125 8<br />
Table 8: Marsh test sample values<br />
The first sample, taken from freshly cut pasture, produced the relatively high<br />
values for the red and green colour bands that were found in the pasture testing<br />
samples for that type of ground colour. In relation to the values for marsh they<br />
showed a high level of disparity; with the mean red colour band pixel value for<br />
marsh being half of the pasture sample, and the green value for marsh being 60%<br />
of the test sample. The disparity in the blue colour band was less but this aspect of<br />
the spectral values could be used to relate the disparities found as specific to<br />
pasture, so that an examination of neighbouring polygon could use a known marsh<br />
area (presence of symbol and expected spectral values) as a reference to set the<br />
relative differences and possibly reset the marsh values to within the values for the<br />
known polygon for that particular areas.<br />
The last suggestion will not be included in this study bit it is worth noting that an<br />
algorithm which could constantly recalibrate the relative values as it processed<br />
neighbouring polygons might produce better results than one dependant on a key<br />
set during the beginning of the processing.<br />
52