You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
110 PART II / THE GREAT REVERSAL<br />
Wages, the Board found, apparently were falling behind advances In<br />
prices and the cost of living.<br />
In the light of all these factors the Board prognosticated no general<br />
reduction of prices, though it suggested somewhat Delphicly that<br />
changes in prices that had already taken place might be the basis for a<br />
more far-reaching alteration in the essential price structure.<br />
Meantime, as a measure to discourage excessive use ofFederal Reserve<br />
credit to finance expansion the Board obtained from Congress an amendment<br />
to the Federal Reserve Act (April 13, 1920) to permit Reserve banks<br />
to vary or graduate the discount rate charged member banks, based upon<br />
the total amount of their borrowing from the Reserve. (Section XIV, 5)<br />
"In this way," explained Governor Harding, "it would be possible to<br />
reduce excessive borrowings of member banks and induce them to hold<br />
their own large borrowers in check without raising the basic rate. The<br />
Federal Reserve banks would thus be provided with an effective method<br />
of dealing with credit expansion, more nearly at the.source than is now<br />
practicable, and without the unnecessary hardship to banks and borrowers<br />
who are conducting their affairs within the bounds of moderation."<br />
He went on to say that "the expansion of credit set in motion by the<br />
war must be checked. Credit must be brought under more effective control<br />
and its flow once more regulated and governed with careful regard<br />
to the economic welfare of the country and the needs of its producing<br />
industries."3<br />
At this juncture Senator Owen, champion of easy money, launched an<br />
attack upon the Federal Reserve's high rediscount rate, charging the<br />
Board with responsibility for a $3 billion depreciation in the $26 billion<br />
of government bonds outstanding.<br />
"I do not think it wise, I do not think it just, I do not think it decent<br />
or ethical," he declared, "for the government agencies to pursue a policy<br />
which causes a loss of $3 billion to their patriotic bondholders."<br />
The Federal Reserve Board, in its review ofApril business, revealed its<br />
mounting concern over the price situation. It said:<br />
The existence of the Federal Reserve System does not relieve a single<br />
banker from his individual responsibility to do his share in checking further<br />
expansion by exercising a stricter control ofthe credit he creates; for, except<br />
in its limited open market purchases of bankers' acceptances, the Federal<br />
Reserve System does not act directly on the volume of credit, but acts only<br />
indirectly, through the banks, on whom the primary responsibility rests.<br />
Clearly, the present is not an appropriate time to extend business merely<br />
for the sake ofincreased volume ofprofits. This applies not only to producers