22.07.2013 Views

America's Money Machine

America's Money Machine

America's Money Machine

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PART III / DEBACLE OF AN IDEA<br />

The International Monetary Fund was set up to provide a reserve pool<br />

of the currencies of the members and to make them available on application<br />

to meet currency needs of indigent members, and thereby prevent<br />

exchange fluctuations, and international currency crises. The significant<br />

thing about the International Monetary Fund was that it restored to<br />

sanctity the gold exchange system, first hallowed by the Geneva Conference<br />

of 1922, but so thoroughly discredited thereafter by the worldwide<br />

collapse of 1932.<br />

The heart of the new gold exchange standard was the U. S. dollar,<br />

which was equated with gold in the Fund's Articles of Agreement.<br />

Let us say Country A (one ofthose nations now called "less developed"<br />

or "developing") had a deficit in its international transactions-that is,<br />

it was unable to sell abroad as much as it wished to buy abroad-and<br />

needed money to pay its foreign creditors. Its own currency was unacceptable<br />

to its creditors. It could, under the rules, apply to the Fund and<br />

obtain dollars to tide it over, hopefully, until it could set its house in<br />

order. In exchange for the dollars the Fund would receive currency ofthe<br />

borrowing country in an amount equivalent-that is, theoretically equivalent-to<br />

the dollars obtained. Obviously, the currency of Country A<br />

would not be of equivalent value of the dollars received or the foreign<br />

creditors themselves would accept Country A's currency in settlement of<br />

debts owing, and Country A would not be under necessity ofapplying to<br />

the Fund for aid.<br />

The subordinate currencies were not equivalent mainly because their<br />

central banks were unable, or unwilling, to deliver gold for their currencies<br />

on demand, and importantly because many of them had no nominal<br />

gold equivalents-that is, in the language of the Fund, no par values had<br />

been established. One ofthe first tasks ofthe Fund was to get the member<br />

countries to establish par values, or gold convertibility, for their currencies.<br />

This required more internal fiscal discipline than most countries<br />

were willing or able to exercise.<br />

The Fund started business with a pool of $7.47 billion nominal value<br />

of currencies subscribed by the participating members, of which $2.75<br />

billion was subscribed by the United States. The United States, however,<br />

was the only member country that maintained gold convertibility of the<br />

dollar,* that is, that freely delivered gold at the statutory parity of $35<br />

an ounce to foreign governments and central banks in exchange for<br />

*International convertibility, that is. Since 1933 U. S. citizens have been unable to obtain<br />

gold for their paper currency.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!