You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Great Investigation 59<br />
of all intelligent men who have studied the question, both here and<br />
abroad, these money panics are entirely due to a defective banking and<br />
currency system....<br />
"I say it, Mr. Chairman, because when we turn to every other great<br />
nation on the face of the earth ... we find that no one of them has had<br />
a money panic for more than fifty years."<br />
Observing with perspicacity that while "elasticity ofcash is important,"<br />
"elasticity ofcredit is ofvastly greater importance," Vreeland pointed out<br />
that 95 per cent of business transactions were done with instruments<br />
other than currency. "The banking part of our problem is vastly more<br />
important than the currency part of it."<br />
Proceeding from these premises he argued against the minimum reserve<br />
requirements of American banking practice. "Go to England,<br />
Austria, France, Germany-any great country abroad," he exhorted<br />
"Not one of them by law requires a bank to keep a dollar of reserve on<br />
hand."<br />
To illustrate his meaning he cited the practice of the French Credit<br />
Lyonnais, at the time the greatest bank in the world, with over $300<br />
million ofdeposits and upwards of$80 million capital funds. He reported<br />
that he asked the governor how much cash he kept in the vault against<br />
these deposits. The governor called his bookkeeper, who announced that<br />
it amounted to about 5 1/2 per cent ofthe demand liabilities. In surprise,<br />
the Congressman asked if they did not have runs upon banks in France,<br />
and did the people never become excited? The governor conceded that<br />
the French did indeed become excited. "With the most excitable people<br />
on earth," asked Vreeland, "how do you feel safe in carrying this small<br />
reserve of 5 1/2 per cent?" The explanation which the Congressman<br />
reported from the governor was that the bank could take to the Bank of<br />
France up to $150 millions of paper bearing three solvent names and<br />
obtain notes "as good as gold." "If I could not do that," added the<br />
governor, "I could not sleep nights."<br />
Vreeland summarized his conclusions in two points.<br />
First, the note issue should be centralized in one institution, with the<br />
issue to rest upon gold and commercial paper, not less than one-half of<br />
the reserve to consist of gold.<br />
Second, the mobilization of part of the cash reserves of the banking<br />
system in one institution, this institution to carry large reserves, and to<br />
have the right to expand its note issue and credit liability based upon gold<br />
and commercial paper.<br />
Congressman Vreeland, had he been gifted with prophetic foresight,