03.08.2013 Views

Ergonomics - Atlas Copco

Ergonomics - Atlas Copco

Ergonomics - Atlas Copco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1.5 m/s 2 . For a grinding machine with a rigid<br />

mass loaded support handle, readings were<br />

down to around 0.5 m/s 2 . We decided, how-<br />

ever, to provide the machine with a lighter<br />

plastic handle, thus saving 0.4 kg in weight.<br />

Isolation of vibration with<br />

a dominant direction<br />

When designing this type of percussive<br />

hand tool, one of the tasks is to develop<br />

a damping system that can transfer high<br />

feed forces over a soft mass spring system.<br />

One source of vibration is the forward and<br />

return action of the impact piston. This<br />

action causes alternating pressures on the<br />

front and rear parts of the piston, with cor-<br />

responding oscillating reactionary forces<br />

on the machine housing.<br />

The isolation built into the machine<br />

also has to be soft. The impact frequency<br />

for these tools often lies around 30 Hz,<br />

therefore the isolation system must have<br />

a natural frequency of its own that is well<br />

below this frequency.<br />

The mass of the machine cannot be in-<br />

creased too much without adversely affect-<br />

ing the design, therefore the spring must be<br />

soft. The damping system on <strong>Atlas</strong> <strong>Copco</strong><br />

Fig. 3.17 Analysis of the grinder in running mode as seen from the front end. Above left: the<br />

machine is fitted with a stiff handle moving in phase. Below left: the machine is fitted with an<br />

anti-vibration handle moving out of phase. The question is, which solution is the best?<br />

111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!