View/Open - Drake University

is:ucs SLICII ;IS motii~ation and commitment. While this process may fluctuate. understanding
~ii!~st p~.ccede commitment.
E\:cn in hest-case scenarios, policy effects cannot be guaranteed. They are typically
inrlil-ect ant1 must operate rhl.ougli already existing settings. Even a well-guided single policy
n~issilc has little hope of changing the s!~ste~n by itself. Policy is transformed and adapted
hoth IO ;rnd b!~ the inlplementing organization. Thus. local implementations \.ill add
cc;nroxt~t~~l 11ieaning 1'1-0111 the immediate "dailiness" of the local setting (McLaushlin. 1987).
7'1iis pe~.specti\,c highlights the individual rather than the instirution and frames
i11lplcmcnt:ition issues as capacity buildin? ancl belief systems of rhe indi~.idual.
Inll~lcrnc~itt'rs at LIII Ic\.els of the process then seek to nesotiare and refi-arne their responses as
1 OS7).
prc~hlcms (11- challenges to the process manifest the~iisel\.es o\,es time (3llcLaughlin.