Joint Operating Concept (JOC) - GlobalSecurity.org
Joint Operating Concept (JOC) - GlobalSecurity.org
Joint Operating Concept (JOC) - GlobalSecurity.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
strategic partners, joint forces will reduce their presence as OGAs and<br />
partners continue long term, steady state activities.<br />
The vignette at Appendix D contains an additional description of how joint<br />
forces might conduct a campaign using an IW approach.<br />
Additional Considerations for Executing IW in Various Operational<br />
Environments Include:<br />
• Executing IW in Support of Friendly States. 25 The joint force has<br />
traditionally supported a friendly state threatened by insurgency or<br />
terrorism by committing joint forces to conduct COIN and CT operations<br />
alongside the friendly state’s security forces within the territory of the<br />
friendly state. This <strong>JOC</strong> takes a wider view of these operations and places<br />
them within the context of a broader IW campaign that extends beyond the<br />
borders of a single threatened state. Future IW will likely expand<br />
traditional single-country COIN to include the gamut of local, regional, and<br />
global actors and considerations. This will require the JFC to employ<br />
forces not only to help defeat an insurgency in a single country, but also to<br />
defeat “an insurgency operating in small cells and teams with ‘low tactical<br />
signature’ in the urban clutter of globalized societies.” 26 These insurgent<br />
groups will be masters of network-centric warfare, but their networks will<br />
include tribal, communal, social, and cultural nets as well as electronic<br />
ones. They will exploit the internet and cyberspace for communications,<br />
propaganda, funding, recruiting, and training. They will function more<br />
like a tribal group, crime syndicate, or extended family than like a military<br />
or paramilitary <strong>org</strong>anization. Consequently, the joint force will have to<br />
defeat the regional or global dimensions of the insurgency by methods<br />
such as strategic communications targeting diasporas, supporting<br />
operations against criminal enterprises supporting the insurgency, and<br />
denying sanctuary in cyberspace and in the ungoverned and undergoverned<br />
areas of non-belligerent states unwilling or unable to take<br />
effective action against non-state adversaries operating within their<br />
borders.<br />
• Executing IW Against a Hostile State. Executing IW against a hostile<br />
state involves UW and other indirect approaches applied in conjunction<br />
with other diplomatic or economic actions such as blockades or sanctions.<br />
While UW has been a traditional core mission of SOF, executing UW as<br />
part of a larger IW effort will be different in the future. UW has<br />
traditionally been confined to operations against a single hostile state or<br />
occupying power. Much of the activities took place either within the<br />
hostile or occupied state or in the neighboring countries that either<br />
directly or tacitly supported efforts against the hostile state. This<br />
construct is changing as hostile states have ever-increasing global linkages<br />
25 Kilcullen, Lt. Col. (Dr.) David J., “Countering Global Insurgency,” The Journal of Strategic<br />
Studies, Vol. 28, No. 4, 597-617, August 2005.<br />
26 Ibid., page 607.<br />
31