12.08.2013 Views

Joint Operating Concept (JOC) - GlobalSecurity.org

Joint Operating Concept (JOC) - GlobalSecurity.org

Joint Operating Concept (JOC) - GlobalSecurity.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix F - Plan for Assessment<br />

1. Insights and Results Gained From Experimentation or Other Forms of<br />

Assessment Conducted During the Writing or Revision Effort<br />

IW <strong>JOC</strong> Limited Objective Experiment (3-5 Oct 06).<br />

Purpose. The IW <strong>JOC</strong> Limited Objective Experiment (LOE) was conducted over<br />

three days (3-5 October 2006) at Booz Allen Hamilton in Mclean, Virginia. The<br />

purpose of the LOE, hosted by US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM)<br />

and sponsored by OSD’s Office of Force Transformation, was to provide a forum<br />

for key stakeholders to further the development of the IW <strong>JOC</strong>, ensuring<br />

completeness, thematic consistency, and operational utility of the concept.<br />

Objectives. The objectives of the LOE were to determine if the operational<br />

environments, LOOs, and focus of operations are adequately captured and<br />

logically consistent in the concept. In order to accomplish these objectives, the<br />

LOE explored the development of a strategic assessment to address the regional<br />

environment, how and what LOOs would be implemented, the effects and<br />

outcomes desired in IW, and the metrics necessary to determine success as well<br />

as identifying critical capabilities needed to conduct IW.<br />

Key Insights<br />

• Insight #1: Teams identified strategic communications, building partner<br />

capabilities and capacity, and security as key instruments of IW.<br />

• Insight #2: The political nature of IW requires an orchestrated effort that<br />

integrates a range of USG capabilities.<br />

• Participants in all groups articulated a need for a clear IW policy at the<br />

presidential and DOD levels, recognizing that most activities in an IW<br />

campaign are non-kinetic.<br />

• Participants expressed a need for a national-level USG concept for IW.<br />

• In order to ensure cooperation and integration within the USG,<br />

participants from all groups highlighted the need for a designated entity<br />

that can provide strategic direction to all government agencies and<br />

compel them to communicate and cooperate for the good of the IW<br />

effort.<br />

• With clear policy and funding lines, the USG writ large must be<br />

empowered to conduct decentralized execution of IW. Participants<br />

highlighted the effectiveness of empowering local commanders and<br />

other USG officials with the authorities, and the authorization, that<br />

allow them to assess and act upon local situations.<br />

• Insight #3: In IW, the approach to intelligence collection should focus on<br />

the population and is integral to the success of an IW campaign.<br />

• Restricted operating environments limit military options and require a<br />

pre-existing human network and clandestine infrastructure that must<br />

be established well in advance of any operations.<br />

Appendix E E-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!