16.08.2013 Views

analysis of a pilot-scale anaerobic baffled reactor treating domestic ...

analysis of a pilot-scale anaerobic baffled reactor treating domestic ...

analysis of a pilot-scale anaerobic baffled reactor treating domestic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The original steady-state model describes a CSTR with no unsteady sludge accumulation.<br />

Consequently, the HRT and sludge age are identical and are calculated from the ratio <strong>of</strong> the volume <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>reactor</strong> V and feed flow rate Q. As with Zeeman and Lettinga’s definition <strong>of</strong> sludge age<br />

(Section 6.3), this definition is not appropriate for an accumulating system. Thus a new hydrolysis<br />

model had to be developed to describe the effect <strong>of</strong> sludge retention on apparent yield in an<br />

accumulating system.<br />

6.4.2.2 Hydrolysis model for a solids retention system<br />

The same general methodology as published in Sötemann et al. (2005) was followed, with the<br />

following assumptions and changes:<br />

• A pseudo-steady-state condition was assumed. This implies that the concentrations <strong>of</strong> reacting<br />

species in the digester did not change with time, i.e. biomass and SBCOD concentration were<br />

approximately constant. (The corollary <strong>of</strong> this assumption is that only inert solid material<br />

accumulated in the digester. This is in line with observations from the nitrogen balance that<br />

little nitrogen accumulates with solids in the digester, Section 6.2.2)<br />

• The concentration <strong>of</strong> solids exiting the digester (XADe) was a fixed fraction fX <strong>of</strong> the total solids<br />

concentration in the digester (XAD):<br />

Using these assumptions, an expression for the apparent system yield, E was derived:<br />

E =<br />

f<br />

Where<br />

X<br />

X =<br />

fX = Ratio solids COD conc. in outflow: average solids conc. in <strong>reactor</strong><br />

YAD = Yield co-efficient for acidogenic micro-organisms<br />

V = Volume <strong>of</strong> digester [m 3 ]<br />

Q = Feed flow rate [m 3 /d]<br />

= Endogenous decay rate [d -1 ]<br />

bAD<br />

ADe<br />

f X ⋅Y<br />

V<br />

+ ⋅ bAD<br />

Q<br />

f<br />

X<br />

AD<br />

X<br />

AD<br />

( 1−<br />

Y )<br />

AD<br />

The complete derivation is presented in Appendix A6.<br />

147<br />

Eq. 6-5<br />

Eq. 6-6<br />

No differentiation was made between unbiodegradable particulate material (UPCOD) that is retained<br />

in the digester, and that which passes out with the effluent. Therefore, it is not possible to accurately<br />

predict outflow COD concentrations (denoted Ste in the model) since these values are inflated by the<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> UPCOD that should be retained in the ABR.<br />

The pseudo-steady-state assumption that implies that reacting species concentrations are<br />

approximately constant and that only UPCOD accumulates, seem reasonable when considering data<br />

from Phase IV where outlet species concentrations do not appear to change significantly with time.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!