16.08.2013 Views

analysis of a pilot-scale anaerobic baffled reactor treating domestic ...

analysis of a pilot-scale anaerobic baffled reactor treating domestic ...

analysis of a pilot-scale anaerobic baffled reactor treating domestic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A filter for converting feed SBCOD composition from the carbohydrate-lipid-protein characterisation<br />

to the elemental composition (CXHYOZNA) is presented in Appendix A6.2.<br />

The wastewater characterisation presented in Table 6.3 represents an average composition <strong>of</strong><br />

Kingsburgh WWTP and was used as a base case for investigation <strong>of</strong> effluent characteristics using the<br />

steady-state model.<br />

An input variable, the extent <strong>of</strong> treatment fE was defined in order that outflow conditions may be<br />

calculated for ranges <strong>of</strong> treatment efficiency. Table 6.4 presents values used in the kinetics part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

steady-state model that is used for predicting the apparent sludge yield <strong>of</strong> the pseudo-steady-state<br />

model.<br />

Table 6.4: Model parameters used in or calculated by the steady-state model<br />

Parameter Unit Value<br />

Volume (V) ℓ 3 000<br />

Flow rate (Q) ℓ/d 1 800<br />

Extent <strong>of</strong> treatment (fE) mgCOD/mgCOD 0.80<br />

Fraction <strong>of</strong> average <strong>reactor</strong> solids concentration<br />

exiting with outflow stream (fX)<br />

mgCOD/mgCOD 0.01<br />

Apparent sludge yield (fraction <strong>of</strong> removed COD<br />

converted to sludge through microbial growth) (E)<br />

mgCOD/mgCOD 0.016<br />

Endogenous rate constant (bH) d -1 0.041<br />

Acidogen yield (YAD) mgCOD/mgCOD 0.113<br />

6.4.4 Comparison <strong>of</strong> steady-state model predictions with experimental data<br />

Several <strong>of</strong> the parameters in Table 6.3 were estimated and may not have been a true reflection <strong>of</strong> the<br />

wastewater characteristics (VFA, protein, carbohydrate, unbiodegradable COD). Therefore, it was not<br />

expected that the steady-state model would precisely match the measured properties <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experimental study.<br />

The steady-state model with sludge retention developed in Appendix A6 was used to calculate an<br />

apparent yield, E. This value represents the reduction in sludge yield due to endogenous respiration <strong>of</strong><br />

biomass resulting from the long retention <strong>of</strong> solids in the <strong>reactor</strong>. The value obtained was<br />

0.016 mgCOD/mgCOD; i.e. <strong>of</strong> the SBCOD removed from the wastewater stream, approximately 1.6%<br />

is converted to biomass. Since the model is derived assuming that the concentrations <strong>of</strong> SBCOD and<br />

biomass do not change significantly with time, this value implies that 1.6% <strong>of</strong> the influent SBCOD<br />

exits the <strong>reactor</strong> as washed out biomass.<br />

Figure 6.4 shows the agreement between the measured and simulated outlet characteristics for pH<br />

value, alkalinity concentration and free and saline ammonia concentration. Relatively good agreement<br />

is obtained between simulated and measured values for all three categories, with the simulated value<br />

for free and saline ammonia and alkalinity falling within the confidence limits <strong>of</strong> the means <strong>of</strong> the<br />

measured values.<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!