16.08.2013 Views

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

the role of tourism in natural resource management in the okavango ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

control is vested with central government. People <strong>in</strong> wildlife areas <strong>the</strong>refore have<br />

very little control or ownership over such <strong>resource</strong>s.<br />

The fact that local communities play no significant <strong>role</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> formulation <strong>of</strong> policies<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g wildlife <strong>management</strong> is confirmed by <strong>the</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Wildlife<br />

Conservation Policy <strong>of</strong> 1986 to provide for community empowerment <strong>in</strong> wildlife<br />

utilization and <strong>management</strong>. Community empowerment <strong>in</strong> this case denotes <strong>the</strong><br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> local people <strong>in</strong> decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g, provision <strong>of</strong> employment, provision <strong>of</strong><br />

skills and education <strong>in</strong> wildlife conservation, and ownership and control <strong>of</strong> wildlife<br />

<strong>resource</strong>s. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Mbaiwa (1999), 49.5 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 95 local <strong>in</strong>habitants<br />

<strong>in</strong>terviewed <strong>in</strong> Sankuyo, Khwai and Mababe felt that government wildlife policies<br />

have failed to provide community empowerment, while 33.7 percent stated that<br />

community empowerment has been provided, but it is <strong>in</strong>sufficient and <strong>in</strong>adequate.<br />

The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 16.8 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terviewees had no op<strong>in</strong>ion on <strong>the</strong> matter (Mbaiwa,<br />

1999).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> 50 local <strong>in</strong>habitants personally <strong>in</strong>terviewed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Okavango Delta,<br />

39 (78 percent) stated that <strong>the</strong>y felt that <strong>the</strong> participation <strong>of</strong> local communities <strong>in</strong><br />

wildlife <strong>management</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area was important. Only 11 (22 percent) felt that it was<br />

not necessary. The 39 <strong>in</strong>dividuals felt that wildlife <strong>management</strong> needs to be a<br />

shared responsibility between resident communities <strong>in</strong> wildlife areas and <strong>the</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and National Parks (DWNP). Many feel that a comb<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong><br />

both local traditional knowledge <strong>of</strong> wildlife <strong>resource</strong> utilization, and <strong>the</strong> modern,<br />

scientific and legislative powers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> DWNP, would prove more effective <strong>in</strong><br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g long-term susta<strong>in</strong>able wildlife <strong>management</strong> and preservation, than through<br />

<strong>the</strong> present, top-down, centralized <strong>management</strong> approach.<br />

7.2.2.3 Attitudes and Perceptions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Local Communities<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Mordi (1991) and Perk<strong>in</strong>s and R<strong>in</strong>grose (1996), <strong>the</strong> general attitudes<br />

and perceptions <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> local <strong>in</strong>habitants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Okavango Delta area are<br />

predom<strong>in</strong>antly negative towards wildlife conservation. The Botswana Government is<br />

perceived to have usurped wildlife <strong>resource</strong> control and ownership from <strong>the</strong> local<br />

people. Hence, wildlife <strong>resource</strong>s are generally regarded as be<strong>in</strong>g government<br />

property and not a communal <strong>resource</strong>. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs by Mwenya et al (1991) <strong>in</strong><br />

290

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!