17.08.2013 Views

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.3.6 Existing systems and actual performances<br />

In 2013, only a few pulsed lidars are available. Table 13 summarizes the characteristics of<br />

commercial ones, which can be used in the wind industry, meteorology or airport safety. All<br />

are based on coherent detection. In 2011, Pentalum introduced a new pulsed lidar, based<br />

on backscatter correlation on two adjacent beams and direct detection. This technique is<br />

currently under evaluation.<br />

Table 13: Comparison of commercially available pulsed lidars<br />

System Wave Range/ Data Sample pulse PRF Beam<br />

length accuracy update volume duration/ [kHz] config.<br />

[µm] [m]/[m s −1 ] [s] length energy<br />

[m] [ns]/[µJ]<br />

Leosphere 1.54 40–200/0.1 1/10 alt 20 175/10 30 Five<br />

WindCube7 beams DBS<br />

WindCube 1.54 100–6000/0.3 1 75 400/100 10 LOS<br />

200S mapping<br />

WindCube 1.54 200–12000/0.5 1 150 800/200 10 LOS<br />

400S mapping<br />

LMCT 1.6 400–15000/1 0.1 80 300/2000 0.75 LOS<br />

Windtracer mapping<br />

Mitsubishi 1.5 100–1500/NA 1 90 600/6.5 1 Scanning<br />

head<br />

Sgurr 1.5 40–250/0.1 0.1–30 24 150/10 20 LOS<br />

Gallion G250 mapping<br />

G4000 1.5 80–4000/NA NA 30 NA NA LOS<br />

mapping<br />

5.3.7 Validation of measurements<br />

Sincetheinstrumentalsourcesofuncertaintyarenowwellidentifiedandtherangeofdeviation<br />

theymightincurin the wind speedmeasurement are wellestimated,it is necessaryto compare<br />

the measurement ofanew lidarunit againstatall mast equippedwith traditionalanemometry<br />

or against a well-known and validated lidar in a double phase verification/validation.<br />

Validationisthe processofensuingthataWINDCUBE measureswindspeed characteristics<br />

in conformity with what a reference instrument would give. Today, validation is done against<br />

well-known traditional anemometry, like a mast equipped with calibrated cup anemometers.<br />

This instrument comparison introduces additional uncertainties, not related to the inner performances<br />

of each individual instrument but related to the differences in the measurement<br />

process between the two instruments. These differences in the measurement process might<br />

incur differences in measured values, which will be site and time specific. Even if these are<br />

small,itis importantto closelydefinetherangeofvariationthat mightoccuronthevalidation<br />

site.<br />

With more than 140 field deployments worldwide for the past 4 years, the Windcube has<br />

beenextensivelytestedindifferentconditionsandunderadiversityofclimates.Severalauthors<br />

have reported very goodmeasurement accuracywith reference to calibratedcup anemometers<br />

in good operating conditions (Oldroyd et al., 2009; Faghani et al., 2009; Jaynes, 2009).<br />

<strong>DTU</strong> Wind Energy-E-Report-0029(EN) 117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!