Publishers version - DTU Orbit
Publishers version - DTU Orbit
Publishers version - DTU Orbit
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
involves interaction of all components of the spectral velocity tensor Φij(k) weighted by the<br />
corresponding weighting functions Xi m (k) and Y ∗<br />
j n (k). It is to be noted that Eqn. (325) is<br />
given in Einstein summation convention, and hence, in order to explicitly see the contribution<br />
of all components of Φij(k) on the measurement of the second-order moments by lidar, this<br />
equation must be expanded for all values of the subscripts i and j. In most cases, this results<br />
in the attenuation of the second-order moments, whereas in some cases this also results in<br />
amplification of the second-order moment, e.g. as observed for the WindCube in the unstable<br />
conditions (see Fig. 168).<br />
13.6 Future Perspectives<br />
It is clear that using the conical scanning and VAD technique to process the data turbulence<br />
cannot be measured precisely. However, it should not be misunderstood that lidars can never<br />
measure turbulence. It depends greatly on the measurement configuration. We are currently<br />
looking into alternative ways of analyzing the lidar data and different beam configurations<br />
that would render turbulence measurements more feasible. One idea is to use two different<br />
half opening angles as in Eberhard et al. (1989), who show that all terms in the Reynolds<br />
stress tensor can be obtained by using the single beam statistics, without resorting to beam<br />
covariances,whichisdoneinthispaper.Thatwouldrequiresignificanthardwaremodifications<br />
to the instruments treated here. Another idea is to supplement the analysis with information<br />
on the width of the Doppler spectra, as done for the momentum flux in Mann et al. (2010),<br />
in order to compensate for the effect of along-beam averaging.<br />
Notation<br />
α spectral Kolmogorov constant<br />
αi ZephIR weighting function that represents the line-of-sight and conical averaging for the w component<br />
βi ZephIR weighting function that represents the line-of-sight and conical averaging for the u component<br />
k wave vector<br />
n unit directional vector<br />
r Separation distance<br />
ǫ rate of viscous dissipation of specific turbulent kinetic energy<br />
Γ turbulence anisotropy parameter<br />
γi ZephIR weighting function that represents the line-of-sight and conical averaging for the v component<br />
ˆTf Spectral transfer function representing the three seconds averaging for the ZephIR<br />
κ von Kármán constant<br />
λ wavelength of the emitted radiation<br />
< v ′ iv′ j > true second-order moment<br />
v instantaneous velocity field<br />
u ′ v ′ ,v ′ w ′ vertical fluxes of the horizontal momentum<br />
w ′ θ ′ v virtual kinematic heat flux<br />
φ half-opening angle<br />
Φij spectral velocity tensor<br />
Θ Mean wind direction<br />
θ azimuth angle<br />
θv virtual potential temperature<br />
˜vr weighted average radial velocity<br />
ϕ lidar weighting function along the line of sight<br />
ai Windcube weighting function that represents the line-of-sight and conical averaging for the w component<br />
bi Windcube weighting function that represents the line-of-sight and conical averaging for the u component<br />
c speed of light<br />
ci Windcube weighting function that represents the line-of-sight and conical averaging for the v component<br />
df focus distance/center of the range gate<br />
f frequency of the emitted radiation<br />
g acceleration due to gravity<br />
L Turbulence length scale<br />
l Rayleigh length<br />
Lf length scale that represents three seconds averaging in the ZephIR<br />
<strong>DTU</strong> Wind Energy-E-Report-0029(EN) 257