17.08.2013 Views

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

involves interaction of all components of the spectral velocity tensor Φij(k) weighted by the<br />

corresponding weighting functions Xi m (k) and Y ∗<br />

j n (k). It is to be noted that Eqn. (325) is<br />

given in Einstein summation convention, and hence, in order to explicitly see the contribution<br />

of all components of Φij(k) on the measurement of the second-order moments by lidar, this<br />

equation must be expanded for all values of the subscripts i and j. In most cases, this results<br />

in the attenuation of the second-order moments, whereas in some cases this also results in<br />

amplification of the second-order moment, e.g. as observed for the WindCube in the unstable<br />

conditions (see Fig. 168).<br />

13.6 Future Perspectives<br />

It is clear that using the conical scanning and VAD technique to process the data turbulence<br />

cannot be measured precisely. However, it should not be misunderstood that lidars can never<br />

measure turbulence. It depends greatly on the measurement configuration. We are currently<br />

looking into alternative ways of analyzing the lidar data and different beam configurations<br />

that would render turbulence measurements more feasible. One idea is to use two different<br />

half opening angles as in Eberhard et al. (1989), who show that all terms in the Reynolds<br />

stress tensor can be obtained by using the single beam statistics, without resorting to beam<br />

covariances,whichisdoneinthispaper.Thatwouldrequiresignificanthardwaremodifications<br />

to the instruments treated here. Another idea is to supplement the analysis with information<br />

on the width of the Doppler spectra, as done for the momentum flux in Mann et al. (2010),<br />

in order to compensate for the effect of along-beam averaging.<br />

Notation<br />

α spectral Kolmogorov constant<br />

αi ZephIR weighting function that represents the line-of-sight and conical averaging for the w component<br />

βi ZephIR weighting function that represents the line-of-sight and conical averaging for the u component<br />

k wave vector<br />

n unit directional vector<br />

r Separation distance<br />

ǫ rate of viscous dissipation of specific turbulent kinetic energy<br />

Γ turbulence anisotropy parameter<br />

γi ZephIR weighting function that represents the line-of-sight and conical averaging for the v component<br />

ˆTf Spectral transfer function representing the three seconds averaging for the ZephIR<br />

κ von Kármán constant<br />

λ wavelength of the emitted radiation<br />

< v ′ iv′ j > true second-order moment<br />

v instantaneous velocity field<br />

u ′ v ′ ,v ′ w ′ vertical fluxes of the horizontal momentum<br />

w ′ θ ′ v virtual kinematic heat flux<br />

φ half-opening angle<br />

Φij spectral velocity tensor<br />

Θ Mean wind direction<br />

θ azimuth angle<br />

θv virtual potential temperature<br />

˜vr weighted average radial velocity<br />

ϕ lidar weighting function along the line of sight<br />

ai Windcube weighting function that represents the line-of-sight and conical averaging for the w component<br />

bi Windcube weighting function that represents the line-of-sight and conical averaging for the u component<br />

c speed of light<br />

ci Windcube weighting function that represents the line-of-sight and conical averaging for the v component<br />

df focus distance/center of the range gate<br />

f frequency of the emitted radiation<br />

g acceleration due to gravity<br />

L Turbulence length scale<br />

l Rayleigh length<br />

Lf length scale that represents three seconds averaging in the ZephIR<br />

<strong>DTU</strong> Wind Energy-E-Report-0029(EN) 257

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!