17.08.2013 Views

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Christiansen et al., 2006). The results are only valid near the meteorological mast as wind<br />

direction cannot be assumed constant for a region.<br />

In the case of ERS-1/2 it was possible to operate the radar in two modes: either scatterometer<br />

or SAR. When set in scatterometer mode the radar recorded from three antennae<br />

but when set in SAR mode the radar recorded from one antenna. Viewing of a given point<br />

at the surface from several different incidence and/or aspect angles allowed for unambiguous<br />

estimatesofthe windspeed and directionfrom a set ofNRCS values at different aspect angles<br />

from the scatterometer. The Geophysical Model Functions (GMFs) were empirically developed<br />

to establish the wind-vector-to-backscatter relationship for the C-band scatterometer<br />

data (e.g. Stoffelen and Anderson, 1997).<br />

The scatterometer model functions have later been proven to be suitable for SAR wind<br />

retrievals as well.<br />

Figure 187(right) showsthe relationshipbetweenfour GMFs forC-bandVV forupwindand<br />

crosswind. The upwind and crosswind directions are defined from the SAR viewing geometry:<br />

the radar look angle difference to the prevailing wind direction. The GMFs are similar for<br />

upwind and downwind geometry but different for other angles with a minimum for crosswind.<br />

In other words,the GMFs are more sensitive to the NRCS forthe upwind/downwindgeometry<br />

than for the crosswind geometry. The signals are also weaker for crosswind.<br />

The GMF for C-band SAR wind retrieval at low to moderate wind speeds CMOD4 is valid<br />

for wind speeds of 2−24ms −1 (Stoffelen & Anderson, 1997). Forhigher wind speeds CMOD-<br />

IFR2 (Quilfen et al., 1998) and CMOD5 (Hersbach et al., 2007) are typically used and are<br />

valid for wind speeds of 2−36 ms −1 . CMOD4, CMOD5 and CMOD-IFR2 all have a nominal<br />

accuracy of ±2ms −1 .<br />

Generally, the empirical GMFs take the following form<br />

σ 0 = U γ(θ) A(θ)[1+B(θ,U)cosφ+C(θ,U)cos2φ] (349)<br />

where σ 0 is the normalized radar cross section (NRCS), U is wind speed at a height of 10 m<br />

for a neutrally-stratified atmosphere, θ is the local incident angle, and φ is the wind direction<br />

with respect to the radar look direction. The coefficients A, B, C and γ are functions of wind<br />

speed and the local incidence angle.<br />

Figure 187: Left: Surface wave and microwave wavelength for radar. Right: Relationship between<br />

Normalized Radar Cross Section (NRCS) and wind speed for upwind and crosswind for<br />

three Geophysical Model Functions CMOD-IFR2, CMOD4 and CMOD5 for a given incidence<br />

angle.<br />

The physical relationship between NRCS and the wind stress (friction velocity) is physically<br />

more direct than to the 10 m wind, hence friction velocity may empirically fit better to NRCS<br />

than 10 m wind. Most users, however, favour 10 m wind speed. Physical models describing<br />

the relationship between NRCS, the 2D wave spectrum, and the scattering mechanisms are<br />

complicated (Romeiser et al., 1997a; 1997b; Kudryavtsev et al., 2003). As a matter of fact,<br />

the empirical GMFs are so far best suited for wind retrieval.<br />

<strong>DTU</strong> Wind Energy-E-Report-0029(EN) 279

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!