17.08.2013 Views

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Normalized W(F l ,R l )<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

F l = 50 m F l = 125 m F l = 200 m Pulsed<br />

0<br />

0 50 100 150<br />

Range R (m)<br />

l<br />

200 250 300<br />

Figure 140: Normalized range weighting function W (Fℓ,Rℓ) for a CW lidar similar to the<br />

ZephIR 300 at three different focus distances along with the range weighting function for a<br />

pulsed lidar similar to the Windcube WLS7.<br />

where the velocity vector u = [u,v,w] is defined such that the u velocity is in the x direction,<br />

v is in the y direction, and w is in the z direction (see Fig. 133). Hub height is represented<br />

by h. The minus signs appear in Eq. (234) because the measured line-of-sight velocity is the<br />

projection of the velocity vector onto the direction from the measurement point to the lidar,<br />

opposite from the lidar look direction. W (Fℓ,Rℓ) is the range weighting function with focus<br />

distance Fℓ and range along the lidar beam Rℓ as arguments.<br />

The range weighting function for a CW lidar becomes broader as the focus distance increases<br />

(the Full width at half maximum of W (Fℓ,Rℓ) scales with the square of the focus<br />

distance Fℓ) (Frehlich and Kavaya 1991; Slinger and Harris 2012). W (Fℓ,Rℓ) is plotted as<br />

a function of range along the lidar beam for three different focus distances in Fig. 140. Also<br />

included in Fig. 140 is the range weighting function for a pulsed lidar similar to the Windcube<br />

WLS7 (Frehlich et al. 2006; Mikkelsen 2009). Note that the pulsed lidar range weighting<br />

function does not vary with measurement distance. Additional details on CW and pulsed<br />

range weighting functions can be found in Simley et al. (2013c).<br />

10.5.2 Geometry Errors<br />

As mentioned in Section 10.4.1, the u component of the wind speed is of interest for wind<br />

turbine control. An estimate of the u component is formed by dividing the line-of-sight<br />

measurement in Eq. (234) by −ℓx, yielding<br />

û = − 1<br />

ℓx uwt,los<br />

= uwt + ℓy<br />

ℓx vwt + ℓz<br />

ℓx wwt.<br />

(236)<br />

As revealed in Eq. (236), detection of the v and w wind speed components causes a degradation<br />

in the estimate of the u component. For a fixed scan radius r, short preview distances d<br />

will result in large measurement angles, causing significant measurement error due to detection<br />

of the v and w components (Simley et al., 2013c). As preview distance increases, the ℓy<br />

and ℓz<br />

ℓx<br />

terms decrease and error caused by measurement geometry will decrease. Figure 141<br />

contains coherence curves for a hub-mounted lidar without range weighting measuring at a<br />

scan radius of r = 41 m for different preview distances. The coherence curves represent the<br />

correlation between the lidar measurement and the wind speed at a single point downstream<br />

of the measurement, so that only geometry errors are included. As preview distance increases,<br />

the measurement coherence increases due to less contribution from the v and w components<br />

in Eq. (236).<br />

204 <strong>DTU</strong> Wind Energy-E-Report-0029(EN)<br />

ℓx

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!