17.08.2013 Views

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 136: Estimated preview required to cancel the delay of the prefilter, as a function of<br />

wind speed. The prefilter is assumed to be a 2nd order low-pass Butterworth filter with cutoff<br />

frequency corresponding to 0.04 rad/m.<br />

The physical reason for this blade-flexibility delay is not understood, but it does conincide<br />

with non-minimum phase zeros in the linearized turbine model. The resulting delay ranges<br />

from 0.05 to 0.3 seconds depending on average wind speed. Additional or different delay in<br />

TyβFF relative to Tywt may appear when a different output of interest is chosen.<br />

10.3.2 Prefilter Preview Time<br />

In additionto the previewtime required to implementthe ideal feedforwardcontroller,preview<br />

timeisneededtoimplementtheminimummeansquareerrorprefilter(Eq.(226)).Theprefilter<br />

generally takes the form of a low-pass filter, where the better the wind measurements are,<br />

the higher the cutoff frequency of the low-pass filter is. Every low-pass filter introduces delay<br />

(or requires equivalent advance knowledge of the incoming signal). The higher the cutoff<br />

frequency of the low-pass filter, the less delay is introduced at any given frequency. Therefore<br />

better measurements mean less delay introduced in the prefilter and less required preview<br />

time.<br />

A typical nacelle-mounted lidar, designed for control, yields good measurements up to a<br />

wavenumber of about 0.04 rad/m. For a wind speed of 13 m/s for example, this frequency is<br />

0.04 rad/m×13 m/s/(2π rad) ≈ 0.08 Hz.<br />

Figure 136 shows the preview time required (the time delay introduced at low frequencies)<br />

by the prefilter, assuming it is a 2nd-order low-pass Butterworth filter with a cutoff frequency<br />

corresponding to 0.04 rad/m. (The amount of delay introduced depends on the order of the<br />

filter in addition to the cutoff frequency. A higher-order means a steeper cutoff and more<br />

delay introduced.) We see that the preview time needed for the prefilter is much greater<br />

than the preview time needed for the ideal feedforward controller, and it decreases with<br />

increasing wind speed, ranging from about 1.5 to 3 seconds. Preview time available from<br />

the lidar measurement also decreases with increasing wind speed because it is determined by<br />

the preview distance divided by the average wind speed. More detail on required preview time<br />

due to pitch actuators, blade flexibility, and imperfect wind measurements can be found in<br />

Dunne et al. (2012).<br />

10.3.3 Pitch Actuation Preview Time<br />

The ideal model-inverse feedforward controllerdesign method assumes we want to minimize a<br />

single output or set of outputs, such as generator speed error or blade root bending moments,<br />

<strong>DTU</strong> Wind Energy-E-Report-0029(EN) 199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!