17.08.2013 Views

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

angle of attack<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

150 100 50 50 100 150<br />

Θ<br />

Vrelms<br />

45.0<br />

44.5<br />

44.0<br />

43.5<br />

43.0<br />

150 100 50 0 50 100 150<br />

Figure 86: phi (left) and w (including induction) (right) as a function of θ, seen from a point<br />

at radius r = 30 m on a rotating blade. Black curve: no shear; grey curve: power law profile<br />

with shear exponent of 0.5<br />

Φ<br />

rotation<br />

w<br />

r<br />

Figure 87: Speed triangle for a blade element at radius r. rΩ is the blade speed and w<br />

corresponds to the sum of the pitch angle, the twist angle and φ. As the twist angle is<br />

constant for a given position on the blade and the pitch angle is 0 ◦ for wind speeds below<br />

rated speed, φ represents the variation of the angle of attack<br />

et al., 2002):<br />

dFT = dFLsinφ−dFDcosφ. (160)<br />

As the wind speed increases with height (e.g. in the case of the power law profile), the<br />

amplitude of the variations of the free wind speed seen by a rotating point increases with the<br />

radius (not shown here). The local tangential force consequently varies with the radius too.<br />

As the torque results from the integral of the tangential force over the whole rotor, it thus<br />

depends on the wind speed profile.<br />

7.2.2 Consequences on the power production<br />

A series of cases were simulated with theoretical wind speed shear defined from the power law<br />

in Eq. (159), with −0.1 < α < 0.5 and 5 m s−1 < uhub < 10 m s−1 . Therelative variationsin<br />

power (defined as the percentage difference between the power outputs obtained with a shear<br />

inflowand an uniform inflow)are shownin Figure 90.Accordingto the simulationsresults, the<br />

power output obtained with shear inflow is generally smaller than the power output obtained<br />

with an uniform inflow. Moreover, it decreases as the shear exponent increases except at 5 m<br />

s−1 where the power output reaches a minimum for α = 0.2 and increases for larger shear<br />

exponents, even exceeding the power output from uniform inflow with α = 0.5.<br />

The first difference between a sheared and an uniform inflow is the kinetic energy flux. In<br />

case of horizontally homogeneous inflow, the kinetic energy flux can be expressed by:<br />

H+R<br />

KEprofile =<br />

H−R<br />

Θ<br />

u<br />

0.5ρu 3 c(z −(zhub −R))dz, (161)<br />

146 <strong>DTU</strong> Wind Energy-E-Report-0029(EN)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!