17.08.2013 Views

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

Publishers version - DTU Orbit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 197: Scattering geometry sketch from Naderi et al. (1991).<br />

A single σ0 measurement is not sufficient to determine both the wind speed and direction.<br />

More measurements are required from different azimuth angles and different polarizations,<br />

obtained with more than one beams. During the wind in<strong>version</strong> process, the set of wind<br />

speed and direction that maximizes the probability of the measured σ0 is determined using<br />

a maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) method. Typically, more than one solutions with<br />

extreme MLE values are obtained, known as “ambiguities”. These ambiguities correspond<br />

to almost the same wind speed but different wind directions. The ambiguity that has the<br />

maximum value is chosen as the “best” estimate. The geometry of each σ0 measurement<br />

or “footprint” depends on the specifications of the scatterometer. Many nearly-simultaneous,<br />

space-collocatedσ0 measurementsare averaged in Wind VectorCells (WVC). The dimensions<br />

of the WVC depend on the mission specifications.<br />

GMFs have evolved during the decades of scatterometer applications, as more measurements<br />

become available and more validation studies are performed. The SASS-2 GMF was<br />

developed by Wentz et al. (1984), using the statistics from 3 months of SASS measurements<br />

and a mean global wind speed from a climatology. The NSCAT mission resulted in a new<br />

GMF, based on the correlation of the radar backscatter with modelled winds from ECMWF<br />

and SSMI wind speeds, as described in Wentz and Smith (1999). The SSM/I GMF was based<br />

on a model for the brightness temperature of the ocean and the atmosphere above, which is<br />

calibrated using buoy and radiosonde data as described in Wentz (1997).<br />

ERS-1 required a new type of GMF due its different operating frequency compared to<br />

SASS. Data collected during several campaigns related σ0 from air-borne instruments with in<br />

situ observations from research ships and buoys. This resulted in the pre-launch GMF known<br />

as CMOD2 (Offlier, 1994). The operational ERS-2 GMF was CMOD4, developed by Stoffelen<br />

and Anderson (1997), using satellite derived σ0 and 10 m winds from the ECMWF analysis.<br />

The CMOD5 function (Hersbach et al., 2007) was released to correct for deficiencies in<br />

the CMOD4 <strong>version</strong>, fitting measurements of extreme backscatter and winds, obtained from<br />

aircraft and in situ data. CMOD5.N, described in Hersbach (2010), is tuned to wind at 10 m<br />

above the surface assuming neutral atmospheric stratification.<br />

16.3 Equivalent Neutral Wind<br />

GMFs are typically derived using open ocean buoy measurements and relating those to radar<br />

backscattermeasurements.Once the empeirical relationshiphas been established,it is applied<br />

to the scatterometer σ0 values to derive the wind speed and direction through the wind<br />

in<strong>version</strong> process. As a convention, σ0 values are related to the wind at 10 meters above the<br />

sea surface assuming a neutral atmospheric stratification, i.e. the Equivalent Neutral Wind<br />

(ENW) (Liu & Tang , 1996).<br />

u = u∗<br />

κ<br />

<br />

z<br />

ln −ΨM<br />

z0<br />

(352)<br />

298 <strong>DTU</strong> Wind Energy-E-Report-0029(EN)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!