A systematic review and economic model of the effectiveness and ...
A systematic review and economic model of the effectiveness and ...
A systematic review and economic model of the effectiveness and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
42<br />
Clinical <strong>effectiveness</strong><br />
TABLE 17 MPH low dose (≤ 15 mg/day) versus non-drug intervention<br />
Study Design Intervention – N Age Duration Core outcomes<br />
(years) (months)<br />
Administered two or more times daily<br />
Brown, 1985 41 P MPH (5–15 mg/day, b.d.) vs 6.3–11.8 6 Core: no hyp; CPRS; ACTRS<br />
cognitive training (12 weeks, QoL: not reported<br />
24 sessions) – 30 AE: not reported<br />
ACTRS, Abbreviated Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale; CPRS, Conners’ Parent Rating Scale; P, Parallel trial.<br />
TABLE 18 MPH medium dose (15–30 mg/day) versus non-drug intervention<br />
Study Design Intervention – N Age Duration Core outcomes<br />
(years) (weeks)<br />
Administered two or more times daily<br />
Brown, 1986 42 P MPH (20.08 mg/day, b.d.) vs 5.7–13.1 3 months Core: CPRS: Hyperactivity Index;<br />
cognitive <strong>the</strong>rapy (11 weeks, ACTeRS: hyperactivity<br />
22 sessions) – 40 AE: not reported<br />
Firestone, 1986 53 P MPH (22.0 mg/day, b.d.) vs 5–9 3 months Core: CTRS: Hyperactivity Index<br />
parent training (3 months) – 134 QoL: not reported<br />
AE: not reported<br />
Pelham, 1993 79 C (3×) MPH (16.2 mg/day, b.d.) vs 5.4–9.9 6 Core: no hyp; IOWA CTRS:<br />
behavioural modification inattention/overactivity<br />
intervention (STP, 8 weeks) – 31 QoL: not reported<br />
AE: not reported<br />
Kolko, 1999 69 C (4×) MPH (1.2 mg/kg/day, b.d.) vs 7–13 6 Core: no hyp; IOWA CTRS:<br />
behavioural modification inattention/overactivity<br />
(6 weeks) – 22 QoL: not reported<br />
AE: no details reported<br />
ACTeRS, ADD-H Comprehensive Teachers’ Rating Scale; C, crossover trial (number <strong>of</strong> crossovers); CPRS, Conners’ Parent<br />
Rating Scale; CTRS, Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale; P, parallel trial.<br />
MPH versus non-drug intervention<br />
MPH low dose (15 mg/day) versus non-drug<br />
intervention<br />
Only Brown <strong>and</strong> colleagues 41 evaluated low-dose<br />
(≤15 mg/day) immediate-release MPH compared<br />
with a non-drug intervention (cognitive training)<br />
(Table 17; with additional information in<br />
Appendix 12). In this study, hyperactivity was not<br />
evaluated, although <strong>the</strong> authors measured overall<br />
behaviour using <strong>the</strong> CPRS <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Abbreviated<br />
CTRS. Results from comparisons between<br />
treatment groups were not clearly presented in<br />
this study.<br />
Summary<br />
No studies in this category examined hyperactivity,<br />
CGI or adverse events.<br />
MPH medium dose (15–30 mg/day) versus nondrug<br />
intervention<br />
Four studies examined medium-dose<br />
(15–30 mg/day) immediate-release MPH<br />
compared with a non-drug intervention (Table 18;<br />
with additional information presented in<br />
Appendix 12). All studies examined MPH<br />
administered two or more times daily.<br />
Only two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studies measured hyperactivity<br />
(Table 19). Firestone <strong>and</strong> colleagues 53 observed<br />
that medium-dose MPH was significantly better<br />
than parent training. This involved sessions <strong>and</strong><br />
group meetings on child management <strong>and</strong><br />
learning how to cooperate efficiently with school<br />
personnel. In <strong>the</strong> study by Brown <strong>and</strong><br />
colleagues, 42 results from comparisons between <strong>the</strong>