31.08.2013 Views

A systematic review and economic model of the effectiveness and ...

A systematic review and economic model of the effectiveness and ...

A systematic review and economic model of the effectiveness and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

42<br />

Clinical <strong>effectiveness</strong><br />

TABLE 17 MPH low dose (≤ 15 mg/day) versus non-drug intervention<br />

Study Design Intervention – N Age Duration Core outcomes<br />

(years) (months)<br />

Administered two or more times daily<br />

Brown, 1985 41 P MPH (5–15 mg/day, b.d.) vs 6.3–11.8 6 Core: no hyp; CPRS; ACTRS<br />

cognitive training (12 weeks, QoL: not reported<br />

24 sessions) – 30 AE: not reported<br />

ACTRS, Abbreviated Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale; CPRS, Conners’ Parent Rating Scale; P, Parallel trial.<br />

TABLE 18 MPH medium dose (15–30 mg/day) versus non-drug intervention<br />

Study Design Intervention – N Age Duration Core outcomes<br />

(years) (weeks)<br />

Administered two or more times daily<br />

Brown, 1986 42 P MPH (20.08 mg/day, b.d.) vs 5.7–13.1 3 months Core: CPRS: Hyperactivity Index;<br />

cognitive <strong>the</strong>rapy (11 weeks, ACTeRS: hyperactivity<br />

22 sessions) – 40 AE: not reported<br />

Firestone, 1986 53 P MPH (22.0 mg/day, b.d.) vs 5–9 3 months Core: CTRS: Hyperactivity Index<br />

parent training (3 months) – 134 QoL: not reported<br />

AE: not reported<br />

Pelham, 1993 79 C (3×) MPH (16.2 mg/day, b.d.) vs 5.4–9.9 6 Core: no hyp; IOWA CTRS:<br />

behavioural modification inattention/overactivity<br />

intervention (STP, 8 weeks) – 31 QoL: not reported<br />

AE: not reported<br />

Kolko, 1999 69 C (4×) MPH (1.2 mg/kg/day, b.d.) vs 7–13 6 Core: no hyp; IOWA CTRS:<br />

behavioural modification inattention/overactivity<br />

(6 weeks) – 22 QoL: not reported<br />

AE: no details reported<br />

ACTeRS, ADD-H Comprehensive Teachers’ Rating Scale; C, crossover trial (number <strong>of</strong> crossovers); CPRS, Conners’ Parent<br />

Rating Scale; CTRS, Conners’ Teacher Rating Scale; P, parallel trial.<br />

MPH versus non-drug intervention<br />

MPH low dose (15 mg/day) versus non-drug<br />

intervention<br />

Only Brown <strong>and</strong> colleagues 41 evaluated low-dose<br />

(≤15 mg/day) immediate-release MPH compared<br />

with a non-drug intervention (cognitive training)<br />

(Table 17; with additional information in<br />

Appendix 12). In this study, hyperactivity was not<br />

evaluated, although <strong>the</strong> authors measured overall<br />

behaviour using <strong>the</strong> CPRS <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Abbreviated<br />

CTRS. Results from comparisons between<br />

treatment groups were not clearly presented in<br />

this study.<br />

Summary<br />

No studies in this category examined hyperactivity,<br />

CGI or adverse events.<br />

MPH medium dose (15–30 mg/day) versus nondrug<br />

intervention<br />

Four studies examined medium-dose<br />

(15–30 mg/day) immediate-release MPH<br />

compared with a non-drug intervention (Table 18;<br />

with additional information presented in<br />

Appendix 12). All studies examined MPH<br />

administered two or more times daily.<br />

Only two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studies measured hyperactivity<br />

(Table 19). Firestone <strong>and</strong> colleagues 53 observed<br />

that medium-dose MPH was significantly better<br />

than parent training. This involved sessions <strong>and</strong><br />

group meetings on child management <strong>and</strong><br />

learning how to cooperate efficiently with school<br />

personnel. In <strong>the</strong> study by Brown <strong>and</strong><br />

colleagues, 42 results from comparisons between <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!