25.10.2012 Views

Fragile Lands of Latin America Strategies for ... - PART - USAID

Fragile Lands of Latin America Strategies for ... - PART - USAID

Fragile Lands of Latin America Strategies for ... - PART - USAID

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fragile</strong> <strong>Lands</strong> 33<br />

Indirect Interventions<br />

The first approach recommended is technology, and approaches to<br />

technology generation <strong>for</strong> fragile lands. These approaches focus on four<br />

closely related, but different technological issues:<br />

What is the state <strong>of</strong> the resource base and our knowledge <strong>of</strong> it?<br />

Do technologies exist <strong>for</strong> controlling erosion and productivity loss<br />

that are pr<strong>of</strong>itable under prevailing economic conditions?<br />

Do technologies exist to raise the sustainable productivity and net<br />

income that can be achieved from the land resource base?<br />

Do research systems exist that can continue to develop the nec-<br />

essary in<strong>for</strong>mation and technologies in ways that ensure their<br />

relevance to fragile lands users?<br />

The last question may be the most important. Without a recognition<br />

<strong>of</strong> why research has failed to address fragile lands needs and what the<br />

special requirements <strong>of</strong> this research are, it is not possible to establish<br />

operational priorities <strong>for</strong> action. Strengthening or redirecting the re-<br />

search establishment itself may be a priority.<br />

The second approach emphasizes the measurement and monitoring<br />

<strong>of</strong> natural resources. The need to improve in<strong>for</strong>mation on changes in<br />

the resource base, particularly in critical areas such as important<br />

watersheds, creates numerous openings <strong>for</strong> government or donor-sup-<br />

ported programs, including strengthening <strong>of</strong> organizations charged with<br />

natural resource monitoring and introduction <strong>of</strong> cost-saving monitoring<br />

techniques.<br />

The third element discusses the role <strong>of</strong> planning and policy re<strong>for</strong>m-<br />

particularly land-use planning, land development policies, regional plan-<br />

ning, agricultural sector policies, and macroeconomic policies. Emphasis<br />

is <strong>of</strong>ten placed on strengthening a government's capacity <strong>for</strong> policy<br />

analysis and <strong>for</strong>mulation to permit full consideration <strong>of</strong> the economic<br />

and environmental implications <strong>of</strong> proposed policies. Since the insti-<br />

tutional responsibilities <strong>for</strong> fragile lands programs are typically spread<br />

across numerous agencies, this makes it unlikely that hnds allocated<br />

to fragile lands will be applied in an effective manner. Concentration<br />

<strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>ts in high-priority areas will require coordination among national<br />

agencies and donors.<br />

Finally, the specific ways in which land is owned and used can have<br />

a significant impact on land use, including investment behavior and<br />

land management in general. One approach to encouraging desired<br />

management behavior is to improve the tenure situation <strong>of</strong> fragile lands

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!