25.12.2013 Views

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LIST OF TABLES<br />

Table 1.1 Trends <strong>in</strong> the UK <strong>dairy</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry 1<br />

Table 1.2<br />

Table 2.1<br />

Table 2.2<br />

Table <strong>of</strong> behavioural scores relat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> particular oestrous<br />

behaviour 36<br />

Table <strong>of</strong> variables <strong>in</strong>vestigated for their effect on the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />

activity at <strong>oestrus</strong> 54<br />

Effect <strong>of</strong> lactation number, parity, oestrous number <strong>and</strong> oestrous<br />

season on activity at <strong>oestrus</strong> 58<br />

Table 2.3 Effect <strong>of</strong> milk yield on activity at <strong>oestrus</strong> 58<br />

Table 2.4<br />

Table 3.1<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>teraction between milk yield <strong>and</strong> parity on the<br />

activity <strong>in</strong>crease at <strong>oestrus</strong> 59<br />

SNPs on genes <strong>in</strong>vestigated for their associations with an <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>in</strong> activity at <strong>oestrus</strong> 70<br />

Table 3.2 PCR reaction reagents 74<br />

Table 4.1<br />

Table 4.2<br />

Table 5.1<br />

Table 5.2<br />

Table 5.3<br />

Table 5.4<br />

Problems <strong>and</strong> solutions concern<strong>in</strong>g equipment set up for<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>dairy</strong> <strong>cows</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g UWB 98<br />

Table show<strong>in</strong>g results <strong>of</strong> 12 hour trial UWB moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>cows</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>oestrus</strong> 100<br />

Results from POC 2 show<strong>in</strong>g each cow’s mount<strong>in</strong>g behaviour<br />

identified from the UWB data, expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal mounts by visual observation 117<br />

Results from POC 3 show<strong>in</strong>g each cow’s mount<strong>in</strong>g behaviour<br />

identified from the UWB data, expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal mounts by visual observation 117<br />

Efficiency <strong>and</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> the optimised script at identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mounts from POC 2 on day <strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> 119<br />

Efficiency <strong>and</strong> accuracy <strong>of</strong> the optimised script at identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mounts from POC 3 on days <strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> 119<br />

Table 5.5 Number <strong>of</strong> mounts declared by the script per day <strong>in</strong> POC 2 121<br />

xiii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!