25.12.2013 Views

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

physical activity <strong>and</strong> stage <strong>of</strong> the oestrous cycle was first documented by<br />

Farris (1954), before confirmation by Kiddy (1976) report<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>cows</strong> are<br />

approximately 2 <strong>to</strong> 4 times more active when <strong>in</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> compared <strong>to</strong> when<br />

they were not.<br />

Activity is measured by a mercury switch <strong>in</strong> the pedometer/ activity<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>r which is turned on or <strong>of</strong>f by cow movement. The device is fixed<br />

around the neck or leg <strong>of</strong> the cow <strong>and</strong> data downloaded at milk<strong>in</strong>g on entry<br />

<strong>to</strong> the parlour or by <strong>in</strong>frared sensors around the barn <strong>and</strong> analysed<br />

au<strong>to</strong>matically. When activity <strong>in</strong>creases above a threshold level or<br />

significantly from the basel<strong>in</strong>e a cow is said <strong>to</strong> be <strong>in</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> <strong>and</strong> this is<br />

flagged up au<strong>to</strong>matically for further attention <strong>and</strong> submission for AI (Firk et<br />

al., 2002). There are significant activity <strong>in</strong>creases on the day <strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong><br />

than on any other day (Sch<strong>of</strong>ield et al., 1991), although it has been said<br />

that activity <strong>in</strong>creases l<strong>in</strong>early <strong>and</strong> gradually from 72 <strong>to</strong> 16 hours before<br />

<strong>oestrus</strong> <strong>and</strong> from 16 hours <strong>to</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> activity <strong>in</strong>creases rapidly (Arney et<br />

al., 1994). It is also reported that a marked <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> activity occurs 4<br />

hours before peak <strong>oestrus</strong> allow<strong>in</strong>g for optimal tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> AI (Nebel et al.,<br />

2000). Activity is an accurate method <strong>of</strong> oestrous <strong>detection</strong> as At-Taras<br />

<strong>and</strong> Spahr (2001) reported activity corresponded most closely <strong>to</strong> st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

behaviour. Secchiari et al., (1998) also confirmed the relationship between<br />

activity <strong>in</strong>crease, time <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> successful conception. Yet this<br />

relies upon the frequency <strong>of</strong> activity records per day.<br />

The efficiency <strong>of</strong> record<strong>in</strong>gs determ<strong>in</strong>ed by activity are <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> 60 <strong>to</strong><br />

100% comb<strong>in</strong>ed from several studies (Senger, 1994), mostly averag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

80-90% accuracy (Firk et al., 2002;Lehrer et al., 1992). Some studies<br />

even achieved 100% accuracy (Arney et al., 1994;Sch<strong>of</strong>ield et al., 1991).<br />

Low values for accuracy arise from false positives; technical faults <strong>and</strong> loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> devices, but also the severity <strong>of</strong> activity <strong>in</strong>crease. When the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />

activity is bigger (4 fold compared <strong>to</strong> 2 fold) <strong>and</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> susta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

activity is longer (approximately 4 hours), <strong>detection</strong> becomes more<br />

efficient <strong>and</strong> accurate (Rorie et al., 2002), as a clear dist<strong>in</strong>ction between<br />

non <strong>oestrus</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> can be made. Error rate has been reported<br />

between 17 <strong>and</strong> 55% <strong>in</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> studies (Firk et al., 2002) due <strong>to</strong> rout<strong>in</strong>e<br />

management tasks caus<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> activity. However, activity<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g is an efficient method <strong>of</strong> oestrous <strong>detection</strong>, more so than<br />

visual <strong>detection</strong> because cont<strong>in</strong>uous moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> data provides a reliable<br />

signal for the onset <strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong>. It is also economical, although not<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!