25.12.2013 Views

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>oestrus</strong>, h 2 =0.27 (Lovendahl et al., 2008). In addition, the heritability <strong>of</strong><br />

oestrous behaviour verified by pedometer data has been reported: days <strong>to</strong><br />

first activity <strong>in</strong>crease, h 2 =0.18, duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong>, h 2 =0.02 <strong>and</strong> strength<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong>, h 2 =0.04 (Lovendahl <strong>and</strong> Chagunda, 2009). Heritability is low,<br />

however, compared <strong>to</strong> production traits <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> enhance selection for <strong>dairy</strong><br />

cow fertility genomic selection would be a suitable alternative <strong>to</strong> traditional<br />

selection methods.<br />

Genomic selection provides a rapid, permanent solution <strong>to</strong> decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

oestrous <strong>expression</strong> which reaps cumulative ga<strong>in</strong>s (Hayes et al., 2009).<br />

Genomic selection has advantages over current genetic selection methods,<br />

especially for traits <strong>of</strong> low heritability because accuracy <strong>of</strong> SNP selection is<br />

high (Muir, 2007), so there is potential <strong>to</strong> improve fertility whilst milk yield<br />

is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed (Veerkamp et al., 2000). Molecular markers for fertility have<br />

already been reported <strong>in</strong> the bov<strong>in</strong>e genome (Hast<strong>in</strong>gs et al., 2006;Khatib<br />

et al., 2008a), yet <strong>in</strong> this study no true significant associations were found<br />

between SNPs <strong>and</strong> the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> activity. There is potential <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigate<br />

further the association between SNPs <strong>and</strong> oestrous <strong>expression</strong> <strong>to</strong> provide<br />

an opportunity, with effective <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegration, for<br />

<strong>in</strong>corporation <strong>of</strong> genomic breed<strong>in</strong>g values for oestrous <strong>expression</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>to</strong><br />

breed<strong>in</strong>g programs <strong>to</strong> allow selection <strong>of</strong> animals that show strong oestrous<br />

<strong>expression</strong>.<br />

Alternative methods <strong>of</strong> oestrous <strong>detection</strong> are required <strong>to</strong> improve<br />

<strong>detection</strong> rates. An accurate <strong>and</strong> effective method <strong>of</strong> <strong>detection</strong> is required<br />

<strong>to</strong> fulfil the criteria described by Senger (1994), where <strong>detection</strong> rate has<br />

the potential <strong>to</strong> be 100% us<strong>in</strong>g an effective system <strong>of</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> all oestrous symp<strong>to</strong>ms (Van Vliet <strong>and</strong> Van Eerdenburg,<br />

1996).<br />

A commercial technique developed <strong>to</strong> improve oestrous <strong>detection</strong> rates is<br />

onl<strong>in</strong>e moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> milk progesterone concentration. The HerdNaviga<strong>to</strong>r<br />

system has additional elements <strong>to</strong> detect health, fertility <strong>and</strong> metabolic<br />

status (Lovendahl <strong>and</strong> Friggens, 2008). Moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> hormones gives an<br />

accurate representation <strong>of</strong> the cow’s physiological status (Friggens <strong>and</strong><br />

Chagunda, 2005) <strong>and</strong> oestrous <strong>detection</strong> rates us<strong>in</strong>g the progesterone<br />

model described by Friggens <strong>and</strong> Chagunda (2005) are comparable with<br />

other au<strong>to</strong>mated techniques; 99.2% <strong>and</strong> 93.7% <strong>detection</strong> rates (Friggens<br />

et al., 2008). However precise tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>oestrus</strong> is unknown, so moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>of</strong> oestradiol would be advantageous (Lopez et al., 2002). Studies<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!