25.12.2013 Views

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

technology larger herds must be moni<strong>to</strong>red by UWB <strong>to</strong> achieve a true<br />

<strong>detection</strong> rate.<br />

5.4.3 Comparison <strong>of</strong> Methods <strong>of</strong> Oestrous Detection<br />

Oestrous <strong>detection</strong> <strong>in</strong> this study was carried out by cont<strong>in</strong>uous visual<br />

observation <strong>and</strong> CCTV record<strong>in</strong>g, milk progesterone analysis <strong>and</strong> activity<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g, alongside UWB <strong>to</strong> test pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> concept <strong>of</strong> a <strong>novel</strong> technology.<br />

Due <strong>to</strong> the experimental design this study required cont<strong>in</strong>uous visual<br />

observation 24 hours a day which was necessary <strong>to</strong> confirm <strong>oestrus</strong><br />

accurately; all types <strong>of</strong> primary <strong>and</strong> secondary oestrous behaviour could be<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>red <strong>and</strong> recorded, which has been reported <strong>to</strong> achieve 100%<br />

accuracy <strong>of</strong> <strong>detection</strong> (Van Vliet <strong>and</strong> Van Eerdenburg, 1996). In a more<br />

practical situation, however, visual observation is carried out at set times<br />

only twice or three times per day. Time <strong>of</strong> day, frequency <strong>and</strong> duration <strong>of</strong><br />

observations can affect accuracy <strong>and</strong> efficiency (Roel<strong>of</strong>s et al., 2010);<br />

<strong>detection</strong> rate at milk<strong>in</strong>g decreases by 30-41% (Cavastany et al., 2008)<br />

<strong>and</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>cows</strong> detected <strong>in</strong> st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>oestrus</strong> <strong>in</strong>creases by 30% when<br />

observations <strong>in</strong>crease from 2 x 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes, <strong>to</strong> 3 x 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes per day<br />

(Roel<strong>of</strong>s et al., 2005). Due <strong>to</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> time <strong>and</strong>/ or will<strong>in</strong>gness, not enough<br />

time is dedicated daily <strong>to</strong> visual observation <strong>in</strong> a commercial situation <strong>and</strong><br />

therefore efficiency is poor <strong>and</strong> <strong>detection</strong> rate decreases (Lehrer et al.,<br />

1992). Efficiency <strong>of</strong> oestrous <strong>detection</strong> by visual observation has been<br />

reported as 74% when consider<strong>in</strong>g all types <strong>of</strong> oestrous behaviour (Van<br />

Vliet <strong>and</strong> Van Eerdenburg, 1996), but when focuss<strong>in</strong>g solely on <strong>detection</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

st<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g heat dur<strong>in</strong>g set <strong>in</strong>tervals efficiency is <strong>of</strong>ten less than 50% (Roel<strong>of</strong>s<br />

et al., 2006;Van Eerdenburg et al., 2002;Van Vliet <strong>and</strong> Van Eerdenburg,<br />

1996).<br />

Hormone analysis has particular advantages over other methods <strong>of</strong><br />

oestrous <strong>detection</strong> because the oestrous cycle is regulated by several key<br />

hormones which can all <strong>in</strong>dicate reproductive status <strong>of</strong> the cow, therefore<br />

periodic measurement <strong>of</strong> a key hormones can be used <strong>to</strong> predict<br />

reproductive status (Delwiche et al., 2001a). Progesterone concentrations<br />

decrease <strong>to</strong> basal over the oestrous period (Friggens <strong>and</strong> Chagunda, 2005)<br />

<strong>and</strong> allow oestradiol <strong>to</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease through removal <strong>of</strong> negative feedback <strong>in</strong><br />

the absence <strong>of</strong> progesterone (Reames et al., 2010). However measurement<br />

<strong>of</strong> progesterone concentration is <strong>in</strong>efficient <strong>and</strong> time consum<strong>in</strong>g, requir<strong>in</strong>g<br />

labour for sample collection, <strong>and</strong> post process<strong>in</strong>g for analysis <strong>of</strong> results<br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!