25.12.2013 Views

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

novel approaches to expression and detection of oestrus in dairy cows

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

which is more difficult <strong>in</strong> a commercial situation (Friggens <strong>and</strong> Chagunda,<br />

2005) <strong>to</strong> produce usable data for predict<strong>in</strong>g potential eligibility for AI. A<br />

more susta<strong>in</strong>able method <strong>of</strong> hormone analysis for oestrous <strong>detection</strong> would<br />

be <strong>to</strong> use an au<strong>to</strong>mated <strong>in</strong>-l<strong>in</strong>e approach (Delwiche et al., 2001a). The<br />

progesterone biosensor has been reported <strong>to</strong> correctly identify all 19<br />

ovula<strong>to</strong>ry events occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> one particular study, although it had a 26%<br />

error rate aris<strong>in</strong>g from variability <strong>and</strong> percentage fat <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual milk<br />

samples (Delwiche et al., 2001a). A commercially available method <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

milk progesterone moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g is HerdNaviga<strong>to</strong>r with elements <strong>to</strong> detect<br />

health, fertility <strong>and</strong> metabolic status (Lovendahl <strong>and</strong> Friggens, 2008). The<br />

method, as described by Friggens <strong>and</strong> Chagunda (2005), has reported<br />

99.2% <strong>detection</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g the model <strong>of</strong> confirmed <strong>oestrus</strong>es (where<br />

<strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation resulted <strong>in</strong> a confirmed pregnancy, n=121) (Friggens et al.,<br />

2008). Furthermore this method detected <strong>oestrus</strong> <strong>in</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> cases<br />

(n=16) where progesterone concentration did not decrease below 4ng/ml,<br />

the set threshold (Friggens et al., 2008), which is advantageous <strong>in</strong><br />

situations where <strong>cows</strong> may not display behavioural <strong>oestrus</strong> due <strong>to</strong> high<br />

progesterone concentration. Furthermore this model also had sufficiently<br />

high <strong>detection</strong> rate when us<strong>in</strong>g ratified <strong>oestrus</strong> (where the shape <strong>of</strong> the<br />

progesterone pr<strong>of</strong>ile matches that <strong>of</strong> the average progesterone pr<strong>of</strong>ile at<br />

confirmed <strong>oestrus</strong>) as a measure <strong>of</strong> <strong>detection</strong> confirmation; 93.7%<br />

(Friggens et al., 2008). However despite this method perform<strong>in</strong>g as well as<br />

other <strong>detection</strong> methods, progesterone moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g is still not precise at<br />

detect<strong>in</strong>g the correct time for AI (Lovendahl <strong>and</strong> Friggens, 2008), unlike<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> oestradiol concentration which correlate more precisely with<br />

time <strong>of</strong> ovulation (Lopez et al., 2002). It has been reported that fixed time<br />

AI on the basis <strong>of</strong> progesterone concentration actually decreased<br />

pregnancy rate (Eddy <strong>and</strong> Clark, 1987). Progesterone measurements can<br />

however aid <strong>detection</strong> by determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g errors <strong>in</strong> oestrous <strong>detection</strong> methods<br />

(Nebel, 1988). By accurately predict<strong>in</strong>g physiological status <strong>and</strong> any<br />

irregularities <strong>in</strong> oestrous cycles (Lovendahl <strong>and</strong> Friggens, 2008) <strong>and</strong><br />

through <strong>detection</strong> <strong>of</strong> silent <strong>oestrus</strong> where <strong>cows</strong> fail <strong>to</strong> display any overt<br />

behaviour (Ranas<strong>in</strong>ghe et al., 2010) as described <strong>in</strong> the current study<br />

where 2 synchronised <strong>cows</strong> with low progesterone did not demonstrate<br />

oestrous behaviour, progesterone moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g is advantageous. Due <strong>to</strong> the<br />

disadvantages <strong>of</strong> milk progesterone moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g Lovendahl <strong>and</strong> Friggens<br />

(2008) decided <strong>to</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>e activity moni<strong>to</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g with milk progesterone<br />

measurements (where possible) <strong>to</strong> overcome the negative aspects. Activity<br />

146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!