26.12.2013 Views

TRANSPLANTED IRISH INSTITUTIONS - University of Canterbury

TRANSPLANTED IRISH INSTITUTIONS - University of Canterbury

TRANSPLANTED IRISH INSTITUTIONS - University of Canterbury

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lecture, in which one <strong>of</strong> the questioners, who had disguised himself by means <strong>of</strong> a black false<br />

moustache, had that ornament knocked <strong>of</strong>r. 134<br />

Apart from this rather odd incident there seemed to be no other apparent reaction to<br />

Shepherd's lectures. The Orange Lodges had even put advertisements in the newspapers<br />

imploring their members to attend. 13 5 This move by the Orange Lodges indicates what<br />

sector <strong>of</strong> the community these lectures most appealed to.<br />

At one <strong>of</strong> her Christchurch meetings Shepherd made the extraordinary claim that<br />

she "represented no organisation and no church, and was quite independent." It seems that<br />

Shepherd did not think that her own Loyal Women <strong>of</strong> American Liberty was an<br />

organization. She was also a member <strong>of</strong> the Ladies' Loyal Orange Association <strong>of</strong> British<br />

America. 136 It is also worth noting that at this same lecture for women only. Shepherd<br />

stated that Protestants and Catholics should not intermarry.137 Two points were being<br />

emphasized here. Firstly by claiming that she did not represent any organization or church<br />

Shepherd was trying to act impartially even though she clearly upheld Protestant theology.<br />

Secondly the admonition against intermarriage between Catholics and Protestant set up the<br />

sectarian divide and only inflamed further prejudice against Catholics.<br />

The reaction <strong>of</strong> the public to Shepherd's lectures is difficult to gauge but one letter<br />

109<br />

to the paper by J. Seager was very scathing <strong>of</strong> Shepherd and her 'sheep'.<br />

After a brief<br />

report on Shepherd's 'sordid' background, Seager described Shepherd's followers- "I was<br />

not surprised to see that the most <strong>of</strong> the people who went to the lectures were <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

class as the lecturess. The air in some quarters reeked <strong>of</strong> beer.<br />

Some were there out <strong>of</strong><br />

curiosity and some to whet their appetite for gossip, but one could distinguish a large<br />

gathering <strong>of</strong> Orange followers, who had come to welcome her. "138<br />

Seager had only<br />

contempt for those who attended the lectures and made the telling point that there were<br />

134Ibid., 11 October 1902.<br />

135Ibid., 30 September 1902.<br />

136MJ. Brady, A Fraud Unmasked: The Career <strong>of</strong> Mrs Margaret L Shepherd, Woodstock, Ontario, n.p.,<br />

1893, p. 52.<br />

1 37Lyttleton Times, 3 October 1902.<br />

138Ibid., II October 1902.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!