TRANSPLANTED IRISH INSTITUTIONS - University of Canterbury
TRANSPLANTED IRISH INSTITUTIONS - University of Canterbury
TRANSPLANTED IRISH INSTITUTIONS - University of Canterbury
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
lecture, in which one <strong>of</strong> the questioners, who had disguised himself by means <strong>of</strong> a black false<br />
moustache, had that ornament knocked <strong>of</strong>r. 134<br />
Apart from this rather odd incident there seemed to be no other apparent reaction to<br />
Shepherd's lectures. The Orange Lodges had even put advertisements in the newspapers<br />
imploring their members to attend. 13 5 This move by the Orange Lodges indicates what<br />
sector <strong>of</strong> the community these lectures most appealed to.<br />
At one <strong>of</strong> her Christchurch meetings Shepherd made the extraordinary claim that<br />
she "represented no organisation and no church, and was quite independent." It seems that<br />
Shepherd did not think that her own Loyal Women <strong>of</strong> American Liberty was an<br />
organization. She was also a member <strong>of</strong> the Ladies' Loyal Orange Association <strong>of</strong> British<br />
America. 136 It is also worth noting that at this same lecture for women only. Shepherd<br />
stated that Protestants and Catholics should not intermarry.137 Two points were being<br />
emphasized here. Firstly by claiming that she did not represent any organization or church<br />
Shepherd was trying to act impartially even though she clearly upheld Protestant theology.<br />
Secondly the admonition against intermarriage between Catholics and Protestant set up the<br />
sectarian divide and only inflamed further prejudice against Catholics.<br />
The reaction <strong>of</strong> the public to Shepherd's lectures is difficult to gauge but one letter<br />
109<br />
to the paper by J. Seager was very scathing <strong>of</strong> Shepherd and her 'sheep'.<br />
After a brief<br />
report on Shepherd's 'sordid' background, Seager described Shepherd's followers- "I was<br />
not surprised to see that the most <strong>of</strong> the people who went to the lectures were <strong>of</strong> the same<br />
class as the lecturess. The air in some quarters reeked <strong>of</strong> beer.<br />
Some were there out <strong>of</strong><br />
curiosity and some to whet their appetite for gossip, but one could distinguish a large<br />
gathering <strong>of</strong> Orange followers, who had come to welcome her. "138<br />
Seager had only<br />
contempt for those who attended the lectures and made the telling point that there were<br />
134Ibid., 11 October 1902.<br />
135Ibid., 30 September 1902.<br />
136MJ. Brady, A Fraud Unmasked: The Career <strong>of</strong> Mrs Margaret L Shepherd, Woodstock, Ontario, n.p.,<br />
1893, p. 52.<br />
1 37Lyttleton Times, 3 October 1902.<br />
138Ibid., II October 1902.