10.01.2014 Views

Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011

Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011

Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The third house site, H3, on Gortmelia hill, is partially exposed but is mostly covered by bog varying<br />

in depth from 10 to 85cms. The probed pr<strong>of</strong>ile also indicates a collapsed ring <strong>of</strong> stones, with<br />

diameters <strong>of</strong> 8.6m internally <strong>and</strong> 15m externally.<br />

Prehistoric settlements<br />

Dooncarton hill<br />

The area <strong>of</strong> bogl<strong>and</strong>, where the isolated boundary on the <strong>North</strong> slope <strong>of</strong> Dooncarton hill is located, is<br />

confined on its West side by present-day agricultural l<strong>and</strong>. It is also confined by agricultural l<strong>and</strong> on<br />

the lower slopes to the East, while the higher slopes <strong>of</strong> the hillside in that area appear too steep to<br />

allow settlement to occur. The presence <strong>of</strong> the court tomb, M14 <strong>and</strong> the stone circle, SC 2, may<br />

indicate that the field boundaries originally extended at least that far along the <strong>North</strong> slope <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hill. The inference that the tomb <strong>and</strong> the stone circle may be reasonably used as indicators <strong>of</strong> the<br />

original presence <strong>of</strong> field boundaries will be discussed later. A local inhabitant, Mr James Cuff, stated<br />

that prehistoric boundaries were also present on the agricultural l<strong>and</strong> on the West side, but were<br />

removed within living memory for building purposes.<br />

The lowlying bog along the <strong>North</strong>west coast in Graghil townl<strong>and</strong> mostly comprises cut-away bogl<strong>and</strong><br />

that displays no evidence <strong>of</strong> prehistoric boundaries. It is unlikely therefore that the field systems, in<br />

this area at least, extended to the coastline, or even extended below the 100 ft contour.<br />

The system on the <strong>North</strong>west slope is mostly separated from that on the Southwest slope by<br />

modern settlement. However as previously noted, the principal upper boundary represents a<br />

unifying factor. The presence <strong>of</strong> a 280m stretch <strong>of</strong> field boundary <strong>and</strong> an unclassified megalith on an<br />

isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> cut-away bogl<strong>and</strong> in the middle <strong>of</strong> the modern settlement also demonstrate that the<br />

prehistoric field system originally extended into that area.<br />

Agricultural l<strong>and</strong> divides the settlement complex on the Southwest slope from the 2 stretches <strong>of</strong><br />

upper boundary feature noted on the Southeast shoulder <strong>of</strong> the hill. The more northerly <strong>of</strong> these 2<br />

stretches curves around an elbow <strong>of</strong> the hillside at an altitude <strong>of</strong> 570 ft OD, its direction indicating<br />

137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!