Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 4 Charcoal identifications from Ceide fields (E494) Sample Date Ctg Context Description Identification Fragment count Weight (g) Size (mm) Growth Ring count Ring curvature Insect holes Tyloses Comment 3 EBA C 3 Charcoal rich soil Betula sp. Roth/Ehrh (birch) 20 0.38 3-6 medium 2-6 strongly curved No No 3 EBA C 3 Charcoal rich soil Corylus avellana L. (hazel) 1 0.01 2 medium 2 strongly curved No No 3 EBA C 3 Charcoal rich soil Salix sp. L. (willow) 3 0.04 2-4 medium 1-2 strongly curved No No 13 EBA H 13 Trench Betula sp. Roth/Ehrh (birch) 11 0.64 2-7 medium 2-8 strongly curved No No 13 EBA H 13 Trench Corylus avellana L. (hazel) 1 0.03 2 medium 4 strongly curved No No 13 EBA H 13 Trench Ilex aquifolium L. (holly) 1 0.07 4 medium 8 strongly curved No No 16 EBA H 9 Charcoal rich soil Betula sp. Roth/Ehrh (birch) 60 1.69 2-10 medium 2-8 strongly curved No No 16 EBA H 9 Charcoal rich soil Ilex aquifolium L. (holly) 5 0.18 2-4 medium 2-8 strongly curved No No 16 EBA H 9 Charcoal rich soil Maloideae sp. (pomaceous fruitwood) 2 0.01 2-4 medium 3 strongly curved No No 16 EBA H 9 Charcoal rich soil Quercus sp. L./Liebl (oak) 1 0.01 3 medium 3 weakly curved No No 16 EBA H 9 Charcoal rich soil Salix sp. L. (willow) 1 0.06 2 medium 2 strongly curved No No 52
Sample Date Ctg Context Description Identification Fragment count Weight (g) Size (mm) Growth Ring count Ring curvature Insect holes Tyloses Comment 19 L. Neo H 15 Ash pit Betula sp. Roth/Ehrh (birch) 5 0.15 3-5 medium 4-13 strongly curved No No 19 L. Neo H 15 Ash pit Corylus/Alnus (hazel/alder) 1 0.02 2 medium 3 strongly curved No No 19 L. Neo H 15 Ash pit Maloideae sp. (pomaceous fruitwood) 2 0.1 5 medium 4 strongly curved No No 22 EBA H 14 Trench Betula sp. Roth/Ehrh (birch) 13 0.94 2-8 medium 3-16 strongly curved No No 22 EBA H 14 Trench Maloideae sp. (pomaceous fruitwood) 1 0.12 2 3 too small to record No No 22 EBA H 14 Trench Salix sp. L. (willow) 4 0.21 3 medium 3 strongly curved No No 25 L. Neo H 15 Ash pit Betula sp. Roth/Ehrh (birch) 32 2.29 3-10 medium 2-10 strongly curved No No 25 L. Neo H 15 Ash pit Corylus avellana L. (hazel) 1 0.01 2 medium 2 strongly curved No No 25 L. Neo H 15 Ash pit Maloideae sp. (pomaceous fruitwood) 5 0.16 2-6 medium 4-7 strongly curved No No 25 L. Neo H 15 Ash pit Quercus sp. L./Liebl (oak) 1 0.04 2 medium 4 strongly curved No No 25 L. Neo H 15 Ash pit Salix sp. L. (willow) 1 0.01 2 3 too small to record No No 26 EBA H 20 Trench Betula sp. Roth/Ehrh (birch) 73 3.11 2-10 medium 2-16 strongly curved No No 53
Page 1 and 2:
Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Introduction ....
Page 5 and 6:
Scientific Research associated with
Page 7 and 8: Introduction This report reviews th
Page 9 and 10: - A summary of the radiocarbon dati
Page 11 and 12: Creating Digital Archaeological Lan
Page 13 and 14: Figure 2: Data Model for NBNM GIS R
Page 15 and 16: Figure 4: example of outputs at Cé
Page 17 and 18: Rathlackan As a result of a lack of
Page 19 and 20: Radiocarbon Dating A further tranch
Page 21 and 22: RATHLACKAN Lab Number F no S. No Co
Page 23 and 24: GLENULRA ENCLOSURE Notes Cal BC (95
Page 25 and 26: Lab Code Cutting Sample Material AR
Page 27 and 28: Charcoal analysis from Neolithic an
Page 29 and 30: Results Overall charcoal 83 samples
Page 31 and 32: Glenulra Scatter 92E140 Middle Neol
Page 33 and 34: Oak and birch were recorded from Cu
Page 35 and 36: 35 30 no of samples 25 20 15 10 5 0
Page 37 and 38: Area A A long length of Neolithic f
Page 39 and 40: piece was 17 years old when cut, ba
Page 41 and 42: elating to midden B2P and from five
Page 43 and 44: 1% 6% Corylus 1% 14% 25% 0% 2% 4% 4
Page 45 and 46: posts burnt in situ. Rather the pos
Page 47 and 48: When the charcoal is examined throu
Page 49 and 50: at Glenulra scatter. Alder was iden
Page 51 and 52: een freely available in the area. T
Page 53 and 54: References Byrne, G., Warren, G., W
Page 55 and 56: Verrill, L. and Tipping, R. 2010. U
Page 57: Table 3 Charcoal identifications fr
Page 61 and 62: Sample Date Ctg Context Description
Page 63 and 64: Sample Trench Time period Descripti
Page 79 and 80: Table 7 Wood identification details
Page 81 and 82: Table 8 Charcoal identifications fr
Page 83 and 84: Cutting Sample Date Feature Descrip
Page 89 and 90: Table 8 Sample assessment Rathlacka
Page 91 and 92: Phase F. S. Trench Deposit type Loc
Page 93 and 94: Behy-Glenulra: Céide Fields visito
Page 95 and 96: A possible midden (B2P) contained a
Page 97 and 98: Wild remains Hazelnut shell fragmen
Page 99 and 100: References Beijerinck, W. 1947. Zad
Page 101 and 102: Verrill, L. and Tipping, R. 2010. A
Page 103 and 104: Soils and Geology Graeme Warren Thi
Page 105 and 106: Figure 3: overview of geological fe
Page 107 and 108: distinctive deposits and landscape
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 4: major landuse categories.
Page 111 and 112:
References ?? Soil Map of West Mayo
Page 113 and 114:
The first scientific paper on late
Page 115 and 116:
Also in the summer of 1963, fifty k
Page 117 and 118:
the earth for the bank coming from
Page 119 and 120:
dates from the macrofossil remains
Page 121 and 122:
New Research and Researchers Over t
Page 123 and 124:
Probed Surveys: Erris, Céide Field
Page 125 and 126:
Iron probes of varying lengths had
Page 127 and 128:
Céide hill twenty five years earli
Page 129 and 130:
Survey on the Glenamoy - Bartnatra
Page 131 and 132:
Bungurra River drains the Knocknalo
Page 133 and 134:
The elevation of the tombs, all sit
Page 135 and 136:
In 1936, 2 sub-rectangular cists, C
Page 137 and 138:
Dooncarton Southwest slope 3.15 km
Page 139 and 140:
The cross-section area occupied by
Page 141 and 142:
No upper boundary was located on Kn
Page 143 and 144:
The third house site, H3, on Gortme
Page 145 and 146:
The 2 court tombs, Ma38 and Ma23, l
Page 147 and 148:
This void is substantiated by exami
Page 149 and 150:
Survey from Ballinglen to Rathfran
Page 151 and 152:
Lissadrone basin. The peat cover is
Page 153 and 154:
Two similar large round cairns are
Page 155 and 156:
Wall Gaps Because of concealment an
Page 157 and 158:
supported by an orthostat visible u
Page 159 and 160:
and with different building techniq
Page 161 and 162:
Survey Illustrations: Figure 1: Ove
Page 163 and 164:
Figure 4: Seefin walls with associa
Page 165 and 166:
Figure 7: Walls from the study area
Page 167 and 168:
Figure 8: Cabintown Site A. 161
Page 169 and 170:
Figure 11: Rathlackan sites H12 Fig
Page 171 and 172:
Figure 15: Creevagh H5, Figure 16:
Page 173:
Figure 19: Carrowkibbock Upper H20.
show all

Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?