Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Figure 5: Belderg Beg, Area F: example of GIS Glenulra Enclosure A composite base plan from a series of survey episodes (most recently by the UCD School of Archaeology MA class) representing the major archaeological features of Glenulra enclosure has been georectified and digitised. This georectification was undertaken using a composite of paper base plans and recent high-grade GPS survey. Cross-checking with aerial photographs and multiple episodes of GPS survey demonstrates a high-level of spatial accuracy (
Rathlackan As a result of a lack of GPS survey points for the excavations at Rathlackan the base-plan for the site has been georeferenced using values derived from the OSI online mapping service and translated from ITM to NGR values. Following subsequent cross-checking against 1 metre resolution aerial photographs an error of 5-10 metres must be taken into account for the Rathlackan excavation base plan. A total of forty-four excavation plans from twelve separate cuttings have been georectified and the vast majority of these have been digitised. As the base plan was used to georectify each of the plans for the individual excavation cuttings the error of 5-10 metres is systematic and all plans are internally consistent. The error could be corrected easily in the future by using high-grade survey. Additional Datasets A series of additional datasets derived from a number of contexts (SMR, EPA, GSI etc.) have been incorporated into the GIS. This data has been simplified and displayed at a variety of scales to allow outputs of value to the NBNM project. Figure X shows the relationship of fieldwalls, megalithic monuments as recorded in the SMR and land use. This clearly demonstrates that fieldwalls do not survive in areas of modern cultivation (green) although monuments do. The presence of both fieldwalls and monuments in areas of bog (brown) suggests that walls and megaliths should be found together and this implies that fieldwalls once covered the land suitable for cultivation as well. In passing it should be noted that the SMR locations are not accurate for many monuments and that, regardless of the errors noted above for the fieldwalls, they are more accurately located than most of the SMR sites. Figure 7: Land use and the survival of different aspects of the Neoltihic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo 11
Page 1 and 2: Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Introduction ....
Page 5 and 6: Scientific Research associated with
Page 7 and 8: Introduction This report reviews th
Page 9 and 10: - A summary of the radiocarbon dati
Page 11 and 12: Creating Digital Archaeological Lan
Page 13 and 14: Figure 2: Data Model for NBNM GIS R
Page 15: Figure 4: example of outputs at Cé
Page 19 and 20: Radiocarbon Dating A further tranch
Page 21 and 22: RATHLACKAN Lab Number F no S. No Co
Page 23 and 24: GLENULRA ENCLOSURE Notes Cal BC (95
Page 25 and 26: Lab Code Cutting Sample Material AR
Page 27 and 28: Charcoal analysis from Neolithic an
Page 29 and 30: Results Overall charcoal 83 samples
Page 31 and 32: Glenulra Scatter 92E140 Middle Neol
Page 33 and 34: Oak and birch were recorded from Cu
Page 35 and 36: 35 30 no of samples 25 20 15 10 5 0
Page 37 and 38: Area A A long length of Neolithic f
Page 39 and 40: piece was 17 years old when cut, ba
Page 41 and 42: elating to midden B2P and from five
Page 43 and 44: 1% 6% Corylus 1% 14% 25% 0% 2% 4% 4
Page 45 and 46: posts burnt in situ. Rather the pos
Page 47 and 48: When the charcoal is examined throu
Page 49 and 50: at Glenulra scatter. Alder was iden
Page 51 and 52: een freely available in the area. T
Page 53 and 54: References Byrne, G., Warren, G., W
Page 55 and 56: Verrill, L. and Tipping, R. 2010. U
Page 57 and 58: Table 3 Charcoal identifications fr
Page 59 and 60: Sample Date Ctg Context Description
Page 61 and 62: Sample Date Ctg Context Description
Page 63 and 64: Sample Trench Time period Descripti
Page 65 and 66: Sample Trench Time period Descripti
Page 67 and 68:
Sample Trench Time period Descripti
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Table 7 Wood identification details
Page 81 and 82:
Table 8 Charcoal identifications fr
Page 83 and 84:
Cutting Sample Date Feature Descrip
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Table 8 Sample assessment Rathlacka
Page 91 and 92:
Phase F. S. Trench Deposit type Loc
Page 93 and 94:
Behy-Glenulra: Céide Fields visito
Page 95 and 96:
A possible midden (B2P) contained a
Page 97 and 98:
Wild remains Hazelnut shell fragmen
Page 99 and 100:
References Beijerinck, W. 1947. Zad
Page 101 and 102:
Verrill, L. and Tipping, R. 2010. A
Page 103 and 104:
Soils and Geology Graeme Warren Thi
Page 105 and 106:
Figure 3: overview of geological fe
Page 107 and 108:
distinctive deposits and landscape
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 4: major landuse categories.
Page 111 and 112:
References ?? Soil Map of West Mayo
Page 113 and 114:
The first scientific paper on late
Page 115 and 116:
Also in the summer of 1963, fifty k
Page 117 and 118:
the earth for the bank coming from
Page 119 and 120:
dates from the macrofossil remains
Page 121 and 122:
New Research and Researchers Over t
Page 123 and 124:
Probed Surveys: Erris, Céide Field
Page 125 and 126:
Iron probes of varying lengths had
Page 127 and 128:
Céide hill twenty five years earli
Page 129 and 130:
Survey on the Glenamoy - Bartnatra
Page 131 and 132:
Bungurra River drains the Knocknalo
Page 133 and 134:
The elevation of the tombs, all sit
Page 135 and 136:
In 1936, 2 sub-rectangular cists, C
Page 137 and 138:
Dooncarton Southwest slope 3.15 km
Page 139 and 140:
The cross-section area occupied by
Page 141 and 142:
No upper boundary was located on Kn
Page 143 and 144:
The third house site, H3, on Gortme
Page 145 and 146:
The 2 court tombs, Ma38 and Ma23, l
Page 147 and 148:
This void is substantiated by exami
Page 149 and 150:
Survey from Ballinglen to Rathfran
Page 151 and 152:
Lissadrone basin. The peat cover is
Page 153 and 154:
Two similar large round cairns are
Page 155 and 156:
Wall Gaps Because of concealment an
Page 157 and 158:
supported by an orthostat visible u
Page 159 and 160:
and with different building techniq
Page 161 and 162:
Survey Illustrations: Figure 1: Ove
Page 163 and 164:
Figure 4: Seefin walls with associa
Page 165 and 166:
Figure 7: Walls from the study area
Page 167 and 168:
Figure 8: Cabintown Site A. 161
Page 169 and 170:
Figure 11: Rathlackan sites H12 Fig
Page 171 and 172:
Figure 15: Creevagh H5, Figure 16:
Page 173:
Figure 19: Carrowkibbock Upper H20.
show all

Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?