Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Cutting Sample Date Feature Description Identification Fragment count Weight (g) Size (mm) Growth Ring count Ring curvature Insect holes Tyloses Comment (pomaceous fruitwood) curved F 42 E/MN ? 49 Layer Quercus sp. L./Liebl (oak) 16 1.06 3-5 medium 4-5 both No No F 42 E/MN ? 49 Layer Salix sp. L. (willow) 2 0.02 2-4 3 strongly curved No No F 45 E/MN 58 Layer Betula sp. Roth/Ehrh (birch) 1 0.08 4 slow 15 strongly curved No No F 45 E/MN 58 Layer Corylus avellana L. (hazel) 9 0.15 4 medium 4-5 strongly curved No No F 45 E/MN 58 Layer Quercus sp. L./Liebl (oak) 12 0.33 2-4 medium 2-4 weakly curved No Yes F 45 E/MN 58 Layer Salix sp. L. (willow) 4 0.04 3 medium 2 No No F 45 E/MN 58 Layer Ulmus sp. L. (elm) 1 0.01 2 medium 2 weakly curved No No F 47 E/MN ? 63 Layer Alnus sp. L. Gärtner (alder) 1 0.02 medium 3 strongly curved No No F 47 E/MN ? 63 Layer Corylus avellana L. (hazel) 34 0.75 4-10 medium 4-9 strongly curved No No F 47 E/MN ? 63 Layer Maloideae sp. (pomaceous fruitwood) 2 0.16 3-10 medium 6-8 strongly curved No No F 47 E/MN ? 63 Layer Pinus sp. L. (pine) 1 0.01 2 medium 2 weakly curved No No F 47 E/MN ? 63 Layer Quercus sp. L./Liebl (oak) 3 0.07 3 medium 2-3 weakly curved No No Twig 78
Cutting Sample Date Feature Description Identification Fragment count Weight (g) Size (mm) Growth Ring count Ring curvature Insect holes Tyloses Comment F 47 E/MN ? 63 Layer Salix sp. L. (willow) 4 0.07 3 medium 3-5 strongly curved No No C 48 E/MN ? 64 Layer Betula sp. Roth/Ehrh (birch) 6 0.21 4 3-4 strongly curved No No C 48 E/MN ? 64 Layer Corylus avellana L. (hazel) 14 1.2 3-15 mixed 13-15 No No C 48 E/MN ? 64 Layer Quercus sp. L./Liebl (oak) 3 0.18 4-6 2-10 strongly curved No No C 48 E/MN ? 64 Layer Salix sp. L. (willow) 2 0.24 6 7 strongly curved No No F 50 mixed 66 Pit Betula sp. Roth/Ehrh (birch) 2 0.01 2 medium 3 strongly curved No No F 50 mixed 66 Pit Corylus avellana L. (hazel) 18 0.36 4-8 medium 8-13 strongly curved No No F 50 mixed 66 Pit Quercus sp. L./Liebl (oak) 8 0.07 4-5 medium 3-5 weakly curved No Yes F 50 mixed 66 Pit Salix sp. L. (willow) 2 0.02 2 medium 3 strongly curved No No F 50 mixed 66 Pit Ulmus sp. L. (elm) 2 0.01 2 medium 2 weakly curved No No ? 59 56 slot trench Alnus sp. L. Gärtner (alder) 2 0.02 3 medium 4 strongly curved No No ? 59 56 slot trench Betula sp. Roth/Ehrh (birch) 1 0.02 3 medium 3 weakly curved No No 79
Page 1 and 2:
Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Introduction ....
Page 5 and 6:
Scientific Research associated with
Page 7 and 8:
Introduction This report reviews th
Page 9 and 10:
- A summary of the radiocarbon dati
Page 11 and 12:
Creating Digital Archaeological Lan
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 2: Data Model for NBNM GIS R
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 4: example of outputs at Cé
Page 17 and 18:
Rathlackan As a result of a lack of
Page 19 and 20:
Radiocarbon Dating A further tranch
Page 21 and 22:
RATHLACKAN Lab Number F no S. No Co
Page 23 and 24:
GLENULRA ENCLOSURE Notes Cal BC (95
Page 25 and 26:
Lab Code Cutting Sample Material AR
Page 27 and 28:
Charcoal analysis from Neolithic an
Page 29 and 30:
Results Overall charcoal 83 samples
Page 31 and 32:
Glenulra Scatter 92E140 Middle Neol
Page 33 and 34: Oak and birch were recorded from Cu
Page 35 and 36: 35 30 no of samples 25 20 15 10 5 0
Page 37 and 38: Area A A long length of Neolithic f
Page 39 and 40: piece was 17 years old when cut, ba
Page 41 and 42: elating to midden B2P and from five
Page 43 and 44: 1% 6% Corylus 1% 14% 25% 0% 2% 4% 4
Page 45 and 46: posts burnt in situ. Rather the pos
Page 47 and 48: When the charcoal is examined throu
Page 49 and 50: at Glenulra scatter. Alder was iden
Page 51 and 52: een freely available in the area. T
Page 53 and 54: References Byrne, G., Warren, G., W
Page 55 and 56: Verrill, L. and Tipping, R. 2010. U
Page 57 and 58: Table 3 Charcoal identifications fr
Page 59 and 60: Sample Date Ctg Context Description
Page 61 and 62: Sample Date Ctg Context Description
Page 63 and 64: Sample Trench Time period Descripti
Page 79 and 80: Table 7 Wood identification details
Page 81 and 82: Table 8 Charcoal identifications fr
Page 83: Cutting Sample Date Feature Descrip
Page 87 and 88: Cutting Sample Date Feature Descrip
Page 89 and 90: Table 8 Sample assessment Rathlacka
Page 91 and 92: Phase F. S. Trench Deposit type Loc
Page 93 and 94: Behy-Glenulra: Céide Fields visito
Page 95 and 96: A possible midden (B2P) contained a
Page 97 and 98: Wild remains Hazelnut shell fragmen
Page 99 and 100: References Beijerinck, W. 1947. Zad
Page 101 and 102: Verrill, L. and Tipping, R. 2010. A
Page 103 and 104: Soils and Geology Graeme Warren Thi
Page 105 and 106: Figure 3: overview of geological fe
Page 107 and 108: distinctive deposits and landscape
Page 109 and 110: Figure 4: major landuse categories.
Page 111 and 112: References ?? Soil Map of West Mayo
Page 113 and 114: The first scientific paper on late
Page 115 and 116: Also in the summer of 1963, fifty k
Page 117 and 118: the earth for the bank coming from
Page 119 and 120: dates from the macrofossil remains
Page 121 and 122: New Research and Researchers Over t
Page 123 and 124: Probed Surveys: Erris, Céide Field
Page 125 and 126: Iron probes of varying lengths had
Page 127 and 128: Céide hill twenty five years earli
Page 129 and 130: Survey on the Glenamoy - Bartnatra
Page 131 and 132: Bungurra River drains the Knocknalo
Page 133 and 134: The elevation of the tombs, all sit
Page 135 and 136:
In 1936, 2 sub-rectangular cists, C
Page 137 and 138:
Dooncarton Southwest slope 3.15 km
Page 139 and 140:
The cross-section area occupied by
Page 141 and 142:
No upper boundary was located on Kn
Page 143 and 144:
The third house site, H3, on Gortme
Page 145 and 146:
The 2 court tombs, Ma38 and Ma23, l
Page 147 and 148:
This void is substantiated by exami
Page 149 and 150:
Survey from Ballinglen to Rathfran
Page 151 and 152:
Lissadrone basin. The peat cover is
Page 153 and 154:
Two similar large round cairns are
Page 155 and 156:
Wall Gaps Because of concealment an
Page 157 and 158:
supported by an orthostat visible u
Page 159 and 160:
and with different building techniq
Page 161 and 162:
Survey Illustrations: Figure 1: Ove
Page 163 and 164:
Figure 4: Seefin walls with associa
Page 165 and 166:
Figure 7: Walls from the study area
Page 167 and 168:
Figure 8: Cabintown Site A. 161
Page 169 and 170:
Figure 11: Rathlackan sites H12 Fig
Page 171 and 172:
Figure 15: Creevagh H5, Figure 16:
Page 173:
Figure 19: Carrowkibbock Upper H20.
show all

Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?