10.01.2014 Views

Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011

Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011

Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

og <strong>and</strong> the underlying mineral soil on this hillslope, pre-bog field boundaries, if present, should<br />

have been located over the course <strong>of</strong> the fieldwork.<br />

Only 2 hills within the study area, Carrowmore hill (200 ft OD +) <strong>and</strong> Pollatomish hill (300 ft OD +)<br />

show no evidence <strong>of</strong> prehistoric settlement. Their altitudes fall within the elevation b<strong>and</strong> for<br />

settlement noted on all <strong>of</strong> the other hillsides.<br />

Modern settlement covers the S slopes <strong>of</strong> Carrowmore hill up to the 200 ft contour. The rest <strong>of</strong> the<br />

hill comprises mostly cut-away bogl<strong>and</strong>. Field boundaries, if originally present would be expected to<br />

extend over the hilltop, as was noted on Gortmelia hill. Extensive excavation during the construction<br />

<strong>of</strong> a modern waterworks on the summit <strong>of</strong> the hill failed to turn up any evidence <strong>of</strong> prehistoric<br />

activity. Where bog still survives on the hilltop <strong>and</strong> slopes, pine trees can be seen in their position <strong>of</strong><br />

growth in its bottom layers. Scrubby pine <strong>and</strong> birch with their roots firmly in the mineral soil are also<br />

evident. Partially cut-away bogl<strong>and</strong> covers Pollatomish hill <strong>and</strong> if field boundaries were originally<br />

present here, they should have been located in the course <strong>of</strong> the fieldwork.<br />

It has already been noted that field boundaries are possibly present on the Southeast slope <strong>of</strong><br />

Faulagh hill in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the court tombs, Ma38 <strong>and</strong> Ma23, but that the absence <strong>of</strong> turbary in<br />

this area hindered their recovery. The other hill slopes where field systems could conceivably be<br />

present are the entire <strong>North</strong> slope <strong>of</strong> Faulagh hill <strong>and</strong> the <strong>North</strong> slope <strong>of</strong> Knocknalower hill between<br />

400 <strong>and</strong> 600 ft contours, also due to the absence <strong>of</strong> turbary. The correlation <strong>of</strong> turbary with the<br />

West <strong>and</strong> S slopes, as rapid drying <strong>of</strong> turf is more favourable on such slopes, may be exerting a<br />

certain influence on the noted distribution <strong>of</strong> prehistoric settlement.<br />

The principal absence <strong>of</strong> settlement over the study area, however, is in the case <strong>of</strong> the lowlying<br />

regions. These include the valley floors, the West <strong>and</strong> <strong>North</strong>west coastal strips, the <strong>North</strong> shore <strong>of</strong><br />

Carrowmore Lake <strong>and</strong> the Glenamoy plain in the E, with its extension into the area between Faulagh<br />

<strong>and</strong> Pollatomish hills. Sufficient factors are present over these areas, including turbary, stream<br />

erosion gullies, quarries <strong>and</strong> modern drainage, to permit the location <strong>of</strong> pre-bog archaeological<br />

features, in at least some instances, if they are present. Since no archaeological evidence was<br />

recorded, the absence is very likely to be genuine.<br />

140

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!