Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011
Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011
Neolithic and Bronze Age Landscapes of North Mayo: Report 2011
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
og <strong>and</strong> the underlying mineral soil on this hillslope, pre-bog field boundaries, if present, should<br />
have been located over the course <strong>of</strong> the fieldwork.<br />
Only 2 hills within the study area, Carrowmore hill (200 ft OD +) <strong>and</strong> Pollatomish hill (300 ft OD +)<br />
show no evidence <strong>of</strong> prehistoric settlement. Their altitudes fall within the elevation b<strong>and</strong> for<br />
settlement noted on all <strong>of</strong> the other hillsides.<br />
Modern settlement covers the S slopes <strong>of</strong> Carrowmore hill up to the 200 ft contour. The rest <strong>of</strong> the<br />
hill comprises mostly cut-away bogl<strong>and</strong>. Field boundaries, if originally present would be expected to<br />
extend over the hilltop, as was noted on Gortmelia hill. Extensive excavation during the construction<br />
<strong>of</strong> a modern waterworks on the summit <strong>of</strong> the hill failed to turn up any evidence <strong>of</strong> prehistoric<br />
activity. Where bog still survives on the hilltop <strong>and</strong> slopes, pine trees can be seen in their position <strong>of</strong><br />
growth in its bottom layers. Scrubby pine <strong>and</strong> birch with their roots firmly in the mineral soil are also<br />
evident. Partially cut-away bogl<strong>and</strong> covers Pollatomish hill <strong>and</strong> if field boundaries were originally<br />
present here, they should have been located in the course <strong>of</strong> the fieldwork.<br />
It has already been noted that field boundaries are possibly present on the Southeast slope <strong>of</strong><br />
Faulagh hill in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the court tombs, Ma38 <strong>and</strong> Ma23, but that the absence <strong>of</strong> turbary in<br />
this area hindered their recovery. The other hill slopes where field systems could conceivably be<br />
present are the entire <strong>North</strong> slope <strong>of</strong> Faulagh hill <strong>and</strong> the <strong>North</strong> slope <strong>of</strong> Knocknalower hill between<br />
400 <strong>and</strong> 600 ft contours, also due to the absence <strong>of</strong> turbary. The correlation <strong>of</strong> turbary with the<br />
West <strong>and</strong> S slopes, as rapid drying <strong>of</strong> turf is more favourable on such slopes, may be exerting a<br />
certain influence on the noted distribution <strong>of</strong> prehistoric settlement.<br />
The principal absence <strong>of</strong> settlement over the study area, however, is in the case <strong>of</strong> the lowlying<br />
regions. These include the valley floors, the West <strong>and</strong> <strong>North</strong>west coastal strips, the <strong>North</strong> shore <strong>of</strong><br />
Carrowmore Lake <strong>and</strong> the Glenamoy plain in the E, with its extension into the area between Faulagh<br />
<strong>and</strong> Pollatomish hills. Sufficient factors are present over these areas, including turbary, stream<br />
erosion gullies, quarries <strong>and</strong> modern drainage, to permit the location <strong>of</strong> pre-bog archaeological<br />
features, in at least some instances, if they are present. Since no archaeological evidence was<br />
recorded, the absence is very likely to be genuine.<br />
140