01.02.2014 Views

biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...

biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...

biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Four<br />

Depositional Environmenment <strong>and</strong> Paleoecology<br />

enable much more sophisticated test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> those observations <strong>in</strong> such<br />

biostratigraphic analysis nevertheless on high resolution results for favorites.<br />

Consequently to avoid <strong>and</strong> reduce the effect <strong>of</strong> such variability we tried to get rid<br />

<strong>of</strong> these sophisticated cases by organization <strong>and</strong> systematic work with relevant<br />

<strong>and</strong> accurate documentation <strong>of</strong> biostratigraphic evidences.<br />

4.4- Planktonic/Benthonic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal ratio <strong>and</strong> Benthic Foram<strong>in</strong>iferal<br />

Assemblage<br />

In the present study, among the most important paleoecological <strong>and</strong><br />

depositional environment factors, the abundance <strong>of</strong> planktic foram<strong>in</strong>ifera,<br />

planktonic species richness, Planktic/Benthic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal ratios, Benthic<br />

Foram<strong>in</strong>iferal assemblage, <strong>and</strong> Agglut<strong>in</strong>ated/Calcareous ratios are used as<br />

important parameters to <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g paleoecological changes <strong>and</strong><br />

paleobathymetric determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> Maastrichtian/Lower Paleocene<br />

succession <strong>in</strong> Sulaimani region (Figs 4.3 - 4.8)<br />

Nyong & Olsson, 1984 (<strong>in</strong> Samir, 2002) have noticed that the <strong>in</strong>ner shelf<br />

depth 10-50m is characterized by low planktonic percentage with low<br />

species diversity <strong>and</strong> high benthic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal assemblages, whereas<br />

higher 8-25% planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>ifera <strong>and</strong> diversity characterize the middle<br />

shelf depth 50-100m. In addition, the outer shelf depth 100-200m is<br />

characterized by 30-70% planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>ifera, while the middle slope<br />

depth 400-800m is characterized by 90% planktonics <strong>and</strong> a slight <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

<strong>in</strong> benthonic diversity.<br />

The ratios <strong>of</strong> Planktonic/Benthonic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal species are a valuable<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> paleobathymetry. The general conventional pattern for benthonic<br />

foram<strong>in</strong>iferal raises from the nearshore environment to the cont<strong>in</strong>ental edge,<br />

further downward decreases significantly towards bathyal depths (Van Der<br />

Zwaan et al., 1990).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to benthonic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal assemblages, many authors<br />

recognized two ma<strong>in</strong> cosmopolitan dist<strong>in</strong>ct, depth-controlled benthic<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!