biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...
biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...
biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter Four<br />
Depositional Environmenment <strong>and</strong> Paleoecology<br />
enable much more sophisticated test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> those observations <strong>in</strong> such<br />
biostratigraphic analysis nevertheless on high resolution results for favorites.<br />
Consequently to avoid <strong>and</strong> reduce the effect <strong>of</strong> such variability we tried to get rid<br />
<strong>of</strong> these sophisticated cases by organization <strong>and</strong> systematic work with relevant<br />
<strong>and</strong> accurate documentation <strong>of</strong> biostratigraphic evidences.<br />
4.4- Planktonic/Benthonic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal ratio <strong>and</strong> Benthic Foram<strong>in</strong>iferal<br />
Assemblage<br />
In the present study, among the most important paleoecological <strong>and</strong><br />
depositional environment factors, the abundance <strong>of</strong> planktic foram<strong>in</strong>ifera,<br />
planktonic species richness, Planktic/Benthic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal ratios, Benthic<br />
Foram<strong>in</strong>iferal assemblage, <strong>and</strong> Agglut<strong>in</strong>ated/Calcareous ratios are used as<br />
important parameters to <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g paleoecological changes <strong>and</strong><br />
paleobathymetric determ<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> Maastrichtian/Lower Paleocene<br />
succession <strong>in</strong> Sulaimani region (Figs 4.3 - 4.8)<br />
Nyong & Olsson, 1984 (<strong>in</strong> Samir, 2002) have noticed that the <strong>in</strong>ner shelf<br />
depth 10-50m is characterized by low planktonic percentage with low<br />
species diversity <strong>and</strong> high benthic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal assemblages, whereas<br />
higher 8-25% planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>ifera <strong>and</strong> diversity characterize the middle<br />
shelf depth 50-100m. In addition, the outer shelf depth 100-200m is<br />
characterized by 30-70% planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>ifera, while the middle slope<br />
depth 400-800m is characterized by 90% planktonics <strong>and</strong> a slight <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
<strong>in</strong> benthonic diversity.<br />
The ratios <strong>of</strong> Planktonic/Benthonic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal species are a valuable<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> paleobathymetry. The general conventional pattern for benthonic<br />
foram<strong>in</strong>iferal raises from the nearshore environment to the cont<strong>in</strong>ental edge,<br />
further downward decreases significantly towards bathyal depths (Van Der<br />
Zwaan et al., 1990).<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to benthonic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal assemblages, many authors<br />
recognized two ma<strong>in</strong> cosmopolitan dist<strong>in</strong>ct, depth-controlled benthic<br />
90