biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...
biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...
biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter Three Biostratigraphy<br />
from predeposited sediment <strong>of</strong> Tanjero bas<strong>in</strong> to be the transitional time <strong>in</strong>terval<br />
from Cretaceous to Tertiary, the second estimation is that the transitional unit<br />
may represent time <strong>in</strong>terval <strong>of</strong> latest Maastrichtian or Earliest Danian <strong>of</strong><br />
deposition, or the upper most part <strong>of</strong> Tanjero Formation chronostratigraphically<br />
may extended to the lower Paleocene while the another contradictory<br />
assumption is that the Red Bed Series may began from the upper Maastrichtian.<br />
The most important sedimentological evidence is Tagaran conglomerate<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the upper part <strong>of</strong> Tanjero formation, shows the same sedimentological<br />
orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong> transitional unit <strong>and</strong> conglomerate beds with<strong>in</strong> the lower part <strong>of</strong><br />
Red Bed Series. (Karim, 2004 <strong>and</strong> Al-Barz<strong>in</strong>jy, 2005), The K/T contact <strong>in</strong> the<br />
studied areas has been <strong>in</strong>terpreted as conformable contact.<br />
3.2.2- Biostratigraphy <strong>of</strong> the Early Paleocene Formations:<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to identified planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal assemblages with<strong>in</strong> Lower<br />
part <strong>of</strong> Kolosh Formation, <strong>in</strong> Smaquli, Dokan <strong>and</strong> Sirwan area, four biozones<br />
recorded <strong>in</strong> the region. The biostratigraphic zones <strong>of</strong> the studied area are<br />
described from the bottom to the top as below:<br />
3.2.2.1- P0. Guembelitria cretacea <strong>in</strong>terval Zone.<br />
The contact l<strong>in</strong>e between Tanjero <strong>and</strong> overly<strong>in</strong>g Kolosh Formation <strong>in</strong> Gali<br />
section placed on the last oily impregnated friable s<strong>of</strong>t <strong>and</strong> weathered pale<br />
brown f<strong>in</strong>e s<strong>and</strong>stone beds <strong>of</strong> 1 meter thickness barren <strong>of</strong> foram<strong>in</strong>ifera except<br />
for few forms <strong>of</strong> Guembelitria cretacea Cushman. This f<strong>in</strong>e s<strong>and</strong>stone bed<br />
overlied by 25cm dark organic papery shale <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>terlayred by th<strong>in</strong> beds <strong>of</strong> dark<br />
grey marl which evidenced by the record <strong>of</strong> Hedbergella monmothensis (Olsson)<br />
with Guembelitria cretacea. This <strong>in</strong>terval is 1,25 meter thick represent<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
Guembelitria cretacea (P0) zone <strong>and</strong> marks the K/T <strong>boundary</strong> <strong>and</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ed as<br />
<strong>in</strong>terval between the ext<strong>in</strong>ction <strong>of</strong> Cretaceous planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>ifera, Last<br />
appearance Datum (LAD) <strong>of</strong> (Globotruncana, Rugoglobiger<strong>in</strong>a,<br />
Globiger<strong>in</strong>elloides, Heterohelicids) at the base <strong>and</strong> the first appearance datum<br />
(FAD) <strong>of</strong> Parvularugoglobiger<strong>in</strong>a eugub<strong>in</strong>a (loterbacher & Premoli Silva) at the<br />
top. (Plate.26, Figs. 17-18) (Fig. 3. 7 part. 2). The Guembelitria cretacea<br />
Biozone is comparatively very well exp<strong>and</strong>ed (1, 25 meter) <strong>and</strong> lithologically<br />
71