01.02.2014 Views

biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...

biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...

biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Four<br />

Depositional Environmenment <strong>and</strong> Paleoecology<br />

species became ext<strong>in</strong>ct below the (K/P) <strong>boundary</strong> while l0 species survived<br />

well <strong>in</strong>to the Danian sediments at El Kef (GSSP) <strong>in</strong> Tunisia, a phenomena<br />

which <strong>in</strong>dicate <strong>in</strong> their op<strong>in</strong>ion that the ext<strong>in</strong>ction is unrelated to an impact event.<br />

In the present study the available data show both gradual <strong>and</strong> sudden<br />

catastrophic ext<strong>in</strong>ction pattern for partially or halve number <strong>in</strong> planktonic<br />

foram<strong>in</strong>iferal species before the (K/T) <strong>boundary</strong> <strong>and</strong> complete species<br />

ext<strong>in</strong>ction at or near the (K/T) <strong>boundary</strong> which <strong>in</strong>dicate no Cretaceous<br />

planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal survivorship <strong>in</strong>to the Danian except <strong>of</strong> (G. cretacea)<br />

<strong>and</strong> (H. monmothensis) <strong>in</strong> the lower most Danian.<br />

In contrast, benthonic foram<strong>in</strong>ifera were not affected by major global<br />

ext<strong>in</strong>ction at the Cretaceous/Tertiary <strong>boundary</strong>, <strong>and</strong> as fact that could not<br />

differentiate between the Danian <strong>and</strong> Maastrichtian <strong>in</strong> the po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> benthonic<br />

foram<strong>in</strong>iferal assemblage po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view (Alegret et al., 2003). In the studied<br />

area, the same document was observed <strong>and</strong> recorded, <strong>in</strong> general benthonic<br />

foram<strong>in</strong>ifera were little affected dur<strong>in</strong>g the K/T mass ext<strong>in</strong>ction which was<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>guished by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the number <strong>of</strong> benthonic species at Smaquli from 12-<br />

11 species at Plummerita hantken<strong>in</strong>oides Zone (CF1) to 7 species <strong>in</strong><br />

Guembelitria cretacea zone (P0) , then <strong>in</strong>creased aga<strong>in</strong> upward to 11 species <strong>in</strong><br />

Parvularugoglobiger<strong>in</strong>a eugub<strong>in</strong>a zone (Pá) becomes 20 species <strong>in</strong> (P1a) <strong>and</strong><br />

lately 18 species <strong>in</strong> Subbot<strong>in</strong>a trilocul<strong>in</strong>oides – Praemurica <strong>in</strong>constans Zone<br />

(P1b) (Fig. 3.8)<br />

In Qulka section (Dokan area), the number <strong>of</strong> species rema<strong>in</strong>s stable 12<br />

species at the end <strong>of</strong> Plummerita hantken<strong>in</strong>oides Zone (CF1) through Late<br />

Maastrichtian to (P0 & Pá) Earliest Danian, then <strong>in</strong>creased upward to 18<br />

species <strong>in</strong> (P1a) Parvularugoglobiger<strong>in</strong>a eugub<strong>in</strong>a - Subbot<strong>in</strong>a trilocul<strong>in</strong>oides<br />

Zone. <strong>and</strong> decreased to 12 species <strong>in</strong> Subbot<strong>in</strong>a trilocul<strong>in</strong>oides- Praemurica<br />

<strong>in</strong>constans Zone (P1b) (Fig. 3.6)<br />

104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!