01.02.2014 Views

biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...

biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...

biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Four<br />

Depositional Environmenment <strong>and</strong> Paleoecology<br />

<strong>and</strong> others, 2002b <strong>in</strong> Keller, 2004), (Abramovich. <strong>and</strong> Keller, 2002). (Samir,<br />

2002),<br />

4.5- The Nature <strong>of</strong> Maastrichtian/Paleogene <strong>boundary</strong><br />

At Smaquli, Qulka <strong>and</strong> Sirwan valley extremely rich <strong>in</strong> micr<strong>of</strong>auna especially<br />

planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>ifera. High resolution biostratigraphic analysis <strong>of</strong> these<br />

sections <strong>in</strong>dicates a major biotic change <strong>in</strong> planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal<br />

assemblages. Neither burrows (trace fossils) nor sedimentary structures,<br />

condensed sections, hard ground, m<strong>in</strong>eralization bed <strong>of</strong> glauconitic, Iron<br />

oxide, silicate, silica spheres, microtectites or any Phosphatic m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />

have been found at the K/T <strong>boundary</strong>. In addition, the great similarities <strong>in</strong><br />

the lithologic components below <strong>and</strong> above the contact l<strong>in</strong>e between<br />

Tanjero <strong>and</strong> Kolosh Formations, <strong>in</strong> which impossible to dist<strong>in</strong>guish or to<br />

differentiate between them lithologically <strong>in</strong> the field. The planktonic<br />

foram<strong>in</strong>iferal biozones recorded <strong>in</strong> the studied area reveals cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />

sedimentation without evidence <strong>of</strong> any hiatus (Figs 3.1-3.8) <strong>in</strong> addition to the<br />

appearance <strong>of</strong> the new lower most Danian Planktonic forams which <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />

the gradual contact at Smaquli area. These data are similar to those<br />

identified from El Kef <strong>in</strong> Tunisia (Keller et al., 1995); Agost, Caravaca,<br />

Zumaya, <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> (Canudo et al., 1991: Pardo et al., 1996: Mol<strong>in</strong>a et al.,<br />

1996, 1998); A<strong>in</strong> Settara <strong>in</strong> Tunisia (Arenillas et al.. 2000); Caravaca SE Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

( Smit, 2005); Egypt (Shah<strong>in</strong>, 1992), (Samir, 2002), ((Keller, 2002),(Obaidalla,<br />

2005) <strong>and</strong> Israel (Keller ,2004).<br />

The ext<strong>in</strong>ction pattern <strong>of</strong> the Late Maastrichtian fauna has been a matter <strong>of</strong><br />

controversy. In this connection, Smit (2005) studied the planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> ext<strong>in</strong>ction across the (K/P) <strong>boundary</strong> at Caravaca SE Spa<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong><br />

believed that the bolide impact event caused the ext<strong>in</strong>ction <strong>of</strong> all Cretaceous<br />

fauna, except for one species (G. cretacea) which considered the<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> Cretaceous <strong>in</strong>dividuals above the K/P <strong>boundary</strong> as due to<br />

rework<strong>in</strong>g. Keller (1988) <strong>in</strong> Obaidalla, 2005 proposed that the 14 Cretaceous<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!