01.02.2014 Views

biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...

biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...

biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter Five<br />

Conclusion<br />

foram became ext<strong>in</strong>ct below the K/T <strong>boundary</strong> at lower part or before the P.<br />

hantken<strong>in</strong>oides zone), where as the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 28 species became ext<strong>in</strong>ct at or<br />

near the K/T <strong>boundary</strong> <strong>and</strong> (G. cretacea) with (H. monmothensis) crossed the<br />

<strong>boundary</strong> <strong>and</strong> survived <strong>in</strong>to the lower most part <strong>of</strong> Danian sediments. (The<br />

occasion was applied on both Qulkqa <strong>and</strong> Sirwan sections also). This sudden<br />

ext<strong>in</strong>ction is a catastrophic event may conta<strong>in</strong> an evidence <strong>of</strong> asteroid impact.<br />

The ext<strong>in</strong>ct species are from both <strong>of</strong> the large, complex <strong>and</strong> small tropicalsubtropical<br />

forms. While the survivor species are <strong>of</strong> the small, cosmopolitan<br />

<strong>and</strong> simple forms.<br />

Consequently the data on stratigraphic range chart strongly imply that the<br />

planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>iferal record across the K/T <strong>boundary</strong> transition can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by earth derived environmental changes <strong>and</strong> that if an extraterrestrial bolide impact<br />

occurred, its effect on mar<strong>in</strong>e plankton foram<strong>in</strong>ifera was <strong>of</strong> the catastrophic<br />

character that is usually assumed, which hesitated <strong>and</strong> term<strong>in</strong>ated the Cretaceous<br />

planktonic fauna <strong>in</strong> the studied area.<br />

14- In general, benthonic foram<strong>in</strong>ifera were little affected dur<strong>in</strong>g the K/T<br />

mass ext<strong>in</strong>ction which was dist<strong>in</strong>guished by reduc<strong>in</strong>g the number <strong>of</strong> benthonic<br />

species at all studied sections, at Plummerita hantken<strong>in</strong>oides zone (CF1) <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>creased aga<strong>in</strong> upward <strong>in</strong> (P1a) <strong>and</strong> (P1b)<br />

15- The planktonic assemblages <strong>of</strong> the lower part from (CF8) to (CF1) <strong>in</strong><br />

Smaquli area <strong>and</strong> (CF5) to (CF2) at Dokan <strong>and</strong> Sirwan valley are characterized<br />

by high values <strong>in</strong> the percentages <strong>of</strong> planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>ifera, p/b ratios, species<br />

richness, low Agglut<strong>in</strong>ated percentages <strong>and</strong> general benthonic morphotypes <strong>of</strong><br />

Upper Cretaceous/Early Paleocene Paleodepth <strong>in</strong>dicators reveal deeper water<br />

bathymetry <strong>of</strong> upper bathyal around 300-600m. depth In Smaquli area, the<br />

outer neritic-upper bathyal depth around 200-400m. depth <strong>in</strong> Dokan <strong>and</strong> Sirwan<br />

area. Middle to outer neritic depth around 100-200m. lower part <strong>of</strong> Qishlagh <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ner to middle neritic depth 50-100m. <strong>in</strong> lower part <strong>of</strong> Kato section.<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!