biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...
biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...
biostratigraphy and paleoecology of cretaceous/tertiary boundary in ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter Two<br />
Lithostratigraphy<br />
white marl, marly siltstone, th<strong>in</strong> bedded recrystalized limestone <strong>and</strong> with clay<br />
ball <strong>and</strong> pillow structure. In this section, it is significant to mention that there<br />
are 3 conglomerate beds at the upper part <strong>of</strong> this unit, with the thickness <strong>of</strong><br />
(0.5 m., –1.5 m., – 0.2 m.) respectively, the conglomerate bed with thickness<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1.5m is previously concluded to be the marker bed <strong>of</strong> Cretaceous/Tertiary<br />
<strong>boundary</strong> at studied section by different authors, Fig (2.11a). Whereas the<br />
negate event is that the exact Cretaceous/Tertiary contact comes after 14m<br />
above the previously mentioned contact, without any obvious change <strong>in</strong><br />
lithologic characters between Tanjero <strong>and</strong> Kolosh Formations at sample No. <strong>of</strong><br />
K20 with the first appearance <strong>of</strong> Paleocene <strong>in</strong>dex foram. taxon .<strong>and</strong><br />
disappearance <strong>of</strong> the Upper Cretaceous planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>ifera <strong>of</strong><br />
Globotruncanids, Heterohelicids <strong>and</strong> Rugoglobiger<strong>in</strong>ids. The contact l<strong>in</strong>e<br />
placed at the base <strong>of</strong> friable, s<strong>of</strong>t <strong>and</strong> weathered f<strong>in</strong>e s<strong>and</strong>stone <strong>and</strong> silty<br />
s<strong>and</strong>stone <strong>of</strong> (5m.) thickness with dilution <strong>of</strong> foram<strong>in</strong>iferal content by abrupt<br />
change <strong>and</strong> without more Cretaceous planktonic foram<strong>in</strong>ifera, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
recognition <strong>of</strong> the major paleoclimatic transform dur<strong>in</strong>g the late Maastrichtian<br />
has focused new attention on climate changes <strong>and</strong> their effect on mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />
organisms, this was reflected on foram<strong>in</strong>iferal survivorship <strong>in</strong> the studied area.<br />
The Kolosh Formation consists <strong>of</strong> 5m s<strong>of</strong>t, friable, weathered s<strong>and</strong>stone,<br />
siltstone at the base, followed by dark grey shale, olive green marl <strong>and</strong> organic<br />
rich shale alternate with th<strong>in</strong> layer <strong>of</strong> siltstone, f<strong>in</strong>e s<strong>and</strong>stone occasionally<br />
<strong>in</strong>tervened th<strong>in</strong> marly limestone layers, <strong>and</strong> 2m <strong>of</strong> s<strong>and</strong>stone, pebbly<br />
s<strong>and</strong>stone <strong>and</strong> friable conglomerate Fig (2.11b) rich <strong>in</strong> reworked fossils <strong>of</strong><br />
solitary corals, <strong>and</strong> small gastropods, pelecypod <strong>and</strong> brachiopods at the<br />
middle part <strong>of</strong> studied <strong>in</strong>terval.<br />
34