18.02.2014 Views

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Shark</strong> <strong>Depredation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Unwanted</strong> <strong>Bycatch</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Pelagic</strong> Longl<strong>in</strong>e Fisheries<br />

A7.5.<br />

<strong>Shark</strong> <strong>Bycatch</strong> Composition <strong>and</strong> Catch Rates<br />

A7.5.1. Catch composition<br />

Blue <strong>Shark</strong>s were the most common species caught (average 69%<br />

of shark catch, range over time period 63–79%), then Mako <strong>Shark</strong>s<br />

17% (8–20%) with the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 14% (5–29%) be<strong>in</strong>g made up of<br />

primarily Bronze Whaler, Cookie Cutter, Crocodile, Dusky, Oceanic<br />

Whitetip, Porbeagle, Thresher, Bigeye Thresher, hammerheads <strong>and</strong><br />

Zambezi <strong>Shark</strong>s (Table A7.2). Blue <strong>Shark</strong>s were reta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 72% of<br />

cases, released alive <strong>in</strong> 18% of cases, f<strong>in</strong>ned <strong>and</strong> discarded (dead) <strong>in</strong><br />

5% <strong>and</strong> unknown for the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 4%. The discarded animals were<br />

often f<strong>in</strong>ned. Observers reported 30% <strong>and</strong> 25% of Blue <strong>Shark</strong> catches<br />

were f<strong>in</strong>ned <strong>in</strong> 2000 <strong>and</strong> 2001, respectively. Mako <strong>Shark</strong>s were also<br />

frequently caught <strong>and</strong> most commonly the whole shark was reta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

(86%). 10% were released alive <strong>and</strong> 2% discarded after f<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Thresher <strong>Shark</strong>s were <strong>in</strong>frequently caught <strong>and</strong> equally discarded/<br />

released <strong>and</strong> reta<strong>in</strong>ed. The Bronze Whaler was <strong>in</strong>frequently<br />

caught, but when it was caught it was usually reta<strong>in</strong>ed. Crocodile,<br />

Cookie Cutter, Dusky (likely to <strong>in</strong>clude misidentified Silky <strong>Shark</strong>s<br />

(C. falciformis), Oceanic Whitetip, Dog Tooth, Bigeye Thresher,<br />

hammerhead spp. <strong>and</strong> Porbeagle sharks were <strong>in</strong>frequently caught,<br />

but almost always discarded/released. Even though the Crocodile<br />

<strong>Shark</strong> was caught <strong>in</strong>frequently, there were some occasions when they<br />

were caught <strong>in</strong> large numbers (e.g. a maximum of 81 was caught <strong>in</strong> a<br />

s<strong>in</strong>gle set). The Zambezi <strong>Shark</strong> was rarely caught <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> both cases it<br />

was discarded or released. Observers did not record whether sharks<br />

were hauled onboard dead or alive.<br />

The catch rate of sharks averaged 6.0 sharks per 1000 hooks <strong>and</strong><br />

ranged between 4 <strong>and</strong> 19.8 dur<strong>in</strong>g 1998-2005 (Table A7.3). Blue<br />

sharks were caught on average at a rate of 4.2 blue sharks per 1000<br />

hooks <strong>and</strong> Short-f<strong>in</strong> Makos at a rate of 1.0 per 1000 hooks (1998-2005)<br />

(Table A7.3).<br />

Seasonal differences <strong>in</strong> catch rates were found for all species<br />

caught <strong>in</strong> substantial numbers (BlueX 2 = 1026.2, Mako X 2 = 190.8,<br />

Crocodile X 2 = 525.5, Brozne Whaler X 2 = 78.5, Dusky X 2 = 101.5,<br />

Hammerhead X 2 = 54.7, Oceanic Whitetip X 2 = 29.8, Porbeagle X 2 = 105.7,<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!