18.02.2014 Views

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Shark</strong> <strong>Depredation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Unwanted</strong> <strong>Bycatch</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Pelagic</strong> Longl<strong>in</strong>e Fisheries<br />

<strong>Pelagic</strong> longl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g occurs throughout the world’s oceans, has been<br />

used s<strong>in</strong>ce the n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century, <strong>and</strong> ranges from small-scale<br />

domestic artisanal fisheries with small sometimes open vessels<br />

to modern mechanized <strong>in</strong>dustrialized fleets from distant-water<br />

fish<strong>in</strong>g nations with large vessels. <strong>Pelagic</strong> longl<strong>in</strong>es, where gear is<br />

suspended from floats drift<strong>in</strong>g at the sea-surface, ma<strong>in</strong>ly target large<br />

tunas (Thunnus spp), swordfish (Xiphias gladius), other billfishes<br />

(Istiorphoridae spp), <strong>and</strong> dolph<strong>in</strong> fish (mahimahi) (Coryphaena<br />

spp), can be up to 100 km long <strong>and</strong> carry up to 3,500 baited hooks<br />

(Brothers et al., 1999).<br />

Much progress has been made to identify effective, commercially<br />

viable, <strong>and</strong> even operationally beneficial methods to significantly<br />

reduce seabird <strong>and</strong> sea turtle bycatch <strong>in</strong> longl<strong>in</strong>e fisheries (Gilman et<br />

al., 2003, 2005, 2006b, 2007; Watson et al., 2005). <strong>Bycatch</strong> of seabirds<br />

<strong>and</strong> sea turtles <strong>in</strong> pelagic longl<strong>in</strong>e fisheries poses a substantial threat<br />

to some albatross, large petrel, leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys<br />

coriacea) <strong>and</strong> loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) populations<br />

(Brothers et al, 1999; FAO, 2004a,b; Gilman, 2001; Gilman et al., 2005,<br />

2006a,b). Relatively little progress has been made to reduce cetacean<br />

<strong>and</strong> shark <strong>in</strong>teractions <strong>in</strong> longl<strong>in</strong>e fisheries (Gilman et al., 2006d).<br />

In some pelagic longl<strong>in</strong>e fisheries, especially <strong>in</strong> fleets that have<br />

restrictions on shark f<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, unwanted shark bycatch <strong>and</strong> depredation<br />

pose substantial ecological, economic, <strong>and</strong> social problems.<br />

As demonstrated <strong>in</strong> some fisheries to address seabird <strong>and</strong> sea turtle<br />

bycatch (Gilman et al., 2005, 2006b; Mart<strong>in</strong> et al., 2006), collaborative<br />

approaches, which tap fishers’ large repository of knowledge, may<br />

likewise successfully reduce unwanted shark <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />

Fig. 1.1. Generalized configuration of pelagic longl<strong>in</strong>e gear.<br />

Fig. 1.1 shows a generalized configuration of pelagic longl<strong>in</strong>e gear.<br />

However, the gear design, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g lengths <strong>and</strong> materials of float,<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>, <strong>and</strong> branch l<strong>in</strong>es; number of hooks between floats; amount<br />

<strong>and</strong> placement of weights on branch l<strong>in</strong>es; depth of gear; <strong>and</strong> types<br />

of hooks <strong>and</strong> bait; as well as methods of sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> haul<strong>in</strong>g, will<br />

vary between fisheries, between vessels <strong>in</strong> a fishery, by season <strong>and</strong><br />

fish<strong>in</strong>g grounds for an <strong>in</strong>dividual vessel, <strong>and</strong> even with<strong>in</strong> the gear of<br />

an <strong>in</strong>dividual vessel.<br />

We collect <strong>in</strong>formation from longl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>dustries rang<strong>in</strong>g from smallscale<br />

artisanal fisheries to large-scale <strong>in</strong>dustrial distant water fleets<br />

to obta<strong>in</strong> a more complete underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of shark-pelagic longl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions, current fisher attitudes <strong>and</strong> practices employed <strong>in</strong><br />

response to shark <strong>in</strong>teractions, identify methods to avoid shark<br />

<strong>in</strong>teractions, identify research priorities <strong>and</strong> assess the effects of<br />

legislation that affect longl<strong>in</strong>e practices <strong>in</strong> catch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sharks. Information on exist<strong>in</strong>g fisher knowledge <strong>and</strong> new strategies<br />

for shark avoidance may benefit sharks <strong>and</strong> fishers want<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

reduce shark <strong>in</strong>teractions. Improv<strong>in</strong>g the underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of longl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry attitudes <strong>and</strong> practices towards shark <strong>in</strong>teractions provides<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>and</strong> management authorities with better <strong>in</strong>formation to<br />

address these problems.<br />

Table 1.1. Number of people by employment status <strong>in</strong>terviewed <strong>in</strong> 12 fisheries <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the study of shark depredation <strong>and</strong> bycatch <strong>in</strong> pelagic longl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

fisheries.<br />

Employment<br />

Category of<br />

Interviewees<br />

Capta<strong>in</strong><br />

(Skipper)<br />

or Fish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Master<br />

Vessel or<br />

Company Owner<br />

(Non-Capta<strong>in</strong>)<br />

Australia<br />

Longl<strong>in</strong>e Tuna<br />

<strong>and</strong> Billfish<br />

Fishery<br />

Chile<br />

Artisanal<br />

Mahimahi <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Shark</strong> Fishery<br />

<strong>and</strong> Swordfish<br />

Fishery<br />

Number People Interviewed<br />

Fiji<br />

Longl<strong>in</strong>e Tuna<br />

Fishery<br />

Italy<br />

Mediterranean<br />

Industrial<br />

Longl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Swordfish<br />

Fishery<br />

Japan<br />

Distant Water,<br />

Offshore <strong>and</strong><br />

Nearhsore<br />

Longl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Fisheries<br />

Peru<br />

Artisanal<br />

Mahi Mahi<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Shark</strong><br />

Fishery<br />

South<br />

Africa<br />

Longl<strong>in</strong>e Tuna<br />

<strong>and</strong> Swordfish<br />

Fishery<br />

USA Hawaii<br />

Longl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Tuna <strong>and</strong><br />

Swordfish<br />

Fisheries<br />

11 13 5 17 19 16 10 10<br />

3 2 1 0 2 0 0 0<br />

Crew 0 7 0 0 1 26 0 2<br />

Fish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Cooperative<br />

Representative<br />

0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0<br />

Port Official 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!