18.02.2014 Views

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Shark</strong> <strong>Depredation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Unwanted</strong> <strong>Bycatch</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Pelagic</strong> Longl<strong>in</strong>e Fisheries<br />

Table A4.5. Italian fish<strong>in</strong>g fleet: catches of sharks <strong>in</strong> 2004 (IREPA, 2006).<br />

Catch (t) Revenue (mln) Price /kg<br />

<strong>Shark</strong>s 951 4.66 4.90<br />

Total fish 201,230 814.42 4.05<br />

Table A4.6. Italian fleet: shark catches, revenue <strong>and</strong> price, 2004<br />

(IREPA, 2006).<br />

Catches (t) Revenue (mln) Price /kg<br />

Trawlers 308 1.73 5.64<br />

Small<br />

scale<br />

517 2.58 4.98<br />

Longl<strong>in</strong>ers 50 0.09 1.88<br />

Total 951 4.66 4.90<br />

Table A4.7. Small-scale <strong>and</strong> large-scale pelagic <strong>and</strong> demersal longl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Italian fleet: catches of sharks <strong>and</strong> target species, 2004 (IREPA, 2006).<br />

Catch (t)<br />

Revenue<br />

(million)<br />

Price/kg<br />

<strong>Shark</strong>s 50 0.09 1.88<br />

Swordfish – Xiphias gladius 3,884 46.98 12.10<br />

Northern bluef<strong>in</strong> tuna – Thunnus<br />

thynnus<br />

319 2.28 7.13<br />

Albacore – Thunnus alalunga 1,115 4.32 3.88<br />

Total fish 8,782 79.17 9.02<br />

There is no Italian longl<strong>in</strong>e fishery that targets sharks. Traditional<br />

fish<strong>in</strong>g activities with demersal longl<strong>in</strong>e target<strong>in</strong>g chondrichthyans,<br />

such as bluntnose sixgill shark (Hexanchus griseus) fish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Ionian Sea <strong>and</strong> kitef<strong>in</strong> shark (Dalatias licha) fish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Ligurian<br />

Sea, have long been ab<strong>and</strong>oned (Vacchi & Notarbartolo di Sciara,<br />

2000). <strong>Shark</strong> f<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g does not occur on Italian vessels (Orsi Rel<strong>in</strong>i,<br />

2000). In any case, Council Regulation (EC) 1185/2003 provides that<br />

remov<strong>in</strong>g shark f<strong>in</strong>s on board, reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> sell them is prohibited.<br />

<strong>Shark</strong>s are captured ma<strong>in</strong>ly by trawlers (32.4%) <strong>and</strong> small scale<br />

fish<strong>in</strong>g practices (54.4%), or as by-catch of longl<strong>in</strong>ers (5.3%) (Table<br />

A4.6) (IREPA, 2006).<br />

Official data <strong>and</strong> statistics on shark catches <strong>and</strong> by-catches suffer<br />

from the same, already mentioned problem: no data are available for<br />

drift<strong>in</strong>g longl<strong>in</strong>e only, because drift<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> set gears are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong><br />

the same class (Table A4.7), which also <strong>in</strong>cludes small- <strong>and</strong> large-scale<br />

fisheries.<br />

Moreover, official trend data on shark catches are of limited utility<br />

<strong>and</strong> difficult to <strong>in</strong>terpret because many species of small <strong>and</strong> medium<br />

sized sharks are generically recorded as “palombo” (Mustelus spp.)<br />

(De Metrio et al., 1982b; Vacchi & Notarbartolo di Sciara, 2000) <strong>and</strong><br />

so reported to <strong>in</strong>ternational bodies (Table A4.8).<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Vannucc<strong>in</strong>i (1999), the ma<strong>in</strong> shark species caught by<br />

the Italian fleet as by-catch are blue sharks (Prionace glauca),thresher<br />

(Alopias vulp<strong>in</strong>us) <strong>and</strong> porbeagle (Lamna nasus). Di Natale (1998)<br />

enclosed a list of shark species reported <strong>in</strong> the by-catch of the Italian<br />

longl<strong>in</strong>e large pelagic fishery: Alopias vulp<strong>in</strong>us, Alopias superciliosus,<br />

Carcharh<strong>in</strong>us brevip<strong>in</strong>na, Carcharh<strong>in</strong>us limbatus, Carcharh<strong>in</strong>us<br />

obscurus, Carcharh<strong>in</strong>us plumbeus, Prionace glaca, Cetorhynus maximus,<br />

Heptranchias perlo, Hexanchus griseus, Carcharodon carcharias, Isurus<br />

oxyr<strong>in</strong>chus, Lamna nasus, Eugomphodus taurus, Odontaspis ferox,<br />

Sphyrna zygaena, Sphyrna mokarran, Sphyrna sp., Squalus acanthias,<br />

Squalus bla<strong>in</strong>villei, Galeorh<strong>in</strong>us galeus, Mustelus mustelus. The same<br />

author (Di Natale, 1998) also reported that some shark species, such as<br />

Alopias ssp., Isurus oxyrh<strong>in</strong>chus, Lamna nasus, are usually marketed,<br />

while other species are sometimes marketed (Prionace glauca,<br />

Carcharh<strong>in</strong>us ssp., Carcharodon carcharias, Squalus ssp., Heptranchias<br />

perlo, Hexanchus griseus, Mustelus ssp., Sphyrna ssp.). Guglielmi et al.<br />

(2000) reported that Prionace glauca is marketed only by some fisheries<br />

(ma<strong>in</strong>ly on Adriatic Sea coast), while other species (Isurus oxyrh<strong>in</strong>chus<br />

<strong>and</strong> Lamna nasus) are valuable <strong>and</strong> usually marketed. De Metrio et<br />

al. (1982a), <strong>in</strong> a paper related to blue shark dynamics of fish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Salento area (North Ionian Sea), reported a trade of this species, with<br />

more then 1,000 specimen totally l<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 1979-1980.<br />

Quantitative data about drift<strong>in</strong>g longl<strong>in</strong>e shark by-catch are available<br />

from a few papers. We subdivide bibliographic material accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the seas where the studies were carried on. Unfortunately, these<br />

papers usually do not provide separate data for small-scale <strong>and</strong> largescale<br />

longl<strong>in</strong>e fisheries.<br />

A4.5. Mediterranean Sea<br />

Megalofonou et al. (2005) conducted a study of <strong>in</strong>cidental catches<br />

<strong>and</strong> discards of pelagic sharks from the swordfish <strong>and</strong> tuna fisheries<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea. Data were taken onboard <strong>and</strong> at fish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

ports from 1998 to 2000 (Table A4.9). <strong>Shark</strong>s comprise about 18% of<br />

the total catch of the Italy Mediterranean Sea large pelagic longl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

fishery. Blue shark (Prionace glauca) was the ma<strong>in</strong> by-catch species <strong>in</strong><br />

all gears <strong>and</strong> areas exam<strong>in</strong>ed. The next most abundant species were<br />

shortf<strong>in</strong> mako (Isurus oxyr<strong>in</strong>chus), thresher shark (Alopias vulp<strong>in</strong>us),<br />

<strong>and</strong> tope shark (Galeorh<strong>in</strong>us galeus) (Megalofonou et al., 2005).<br />

Table A4.10 shows data related to Italian waters recorded onboard<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g a study by Megalofonou et al. (2005), where the average shark<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed species CPUE of the four fish<strong>in</strong>g areas was 0.744 sharks<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed species per 1000 hooks.<br />

Guglielmi et al. (2000) present data from onboard observations<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g fish<strong>in</strong>g seasons 1998-1999. <strong>Shark</strong>s were caught by swordfish,<br />

albacore <strong>and</strong> Northern bluef<strong>in</strong> tuna longl<strong>in</strong>e vessels <strong>in</strong> the Central<br />

Mediterranean Sea (Table A4.11).<br />

78

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!