18.02.2014 Views

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

Shark Depredation and Unwanted Bycatch in Pelagic Longline

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fiji <strong>Pelagic</strong> Longl<strong>in</strong>e Tuna Fishery<br />

A3.5. Catch <strong>and</strong> Discard Rates of Target <strong>and</strong> <strong>Bycatch</strong><br />

Species<br />

The data <strong>in</strong> Table 3 were provided by the Secretariat of the Pacific<br />

Commission’s Oceanic Fisheries Programme (SPC OFP) which has<br />

compiled observer programme data provided by the Fiji Government.<br />

It is important to note that observer coverage is very low, particularly<br />

for 1999 to 2004, hence may not be representative. Observer coverage<br />

ranges from 4.51% to 0.34% of hooks observed out of the total fish<strong>in</strong>g<br />

effort per year (Lawson, Pers. comm.).<br />

The data <strong>in</strong> Table A3.4 come from catch logsheets completed by vessels<br />

<strong>and</strong> provided to the Fiji Fisheries Department as a condition of the<br />

licence. Logsheets do not provide full coverage of activities <strong>and</strong> have been<br />

extrapolated by the Fisheries Department to account for miss<strong>in</strong>g data.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to SPC data, over the five years for which observer<br />

programme data are available, sharks formed 3 - 10% of the catch<br />

per effort <strong>and</strong> 8 to 25% of the weight of the catch per effort.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Fiji Fisheries Department’s data <strong>in</strong> 2004, sharks<br />

comprise 6% of the total catch by weight that year while SPC <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />

that sharks comprised 14%. Another contradiction is that, accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to a 1999 study, sharks formed a major portion of the tuna longl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

fishery at that time. The data supplied by observers on local vessels<br />

showed that sharks comprised > 25% (by number) of the total catch,<br />

most of which was discarded (Swamy, 1999). However, these data do<br />

not reflect what proportion of this catch was reta<strong>in</strong>ed or discarded.<br />

SPC Observer Programme Data for 1999 <strong>and</strong> 2002 to 2005 (Table<br />

A3.5) <strong>in</strong>dicate that, of the sharks that were observed be<strong>in</strong>g caught,<br />

78 to 90% were f<strong>in</strong>ned <strong>and</strong> 82 to 94% were discarded. A significantly<br />

larger proportion of the shark catch was alive when hauled to the<br />

boat, most of the small proportion of sharks that were discarded were<br />

dead at that stage.<br />

Tables A3.6 to A3.8 <strong>in</strong>dicate catch, mortality <strong>and</strong> discard rates for<br />

the three most commonly caught shark species as <strong>in</strong>dicated by SPC<br />

observer programme data. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the data the three most<br />

commonly caught species <strong>in</strong> order of most to less common are: Blue<br />

<strong>Shark</strong> (Prionace glauca); Oceanic Whitetip <strong>Shark</strong> (Carcharh<strong>in</strong>us<br />

longimanus); <strong>and</strong> Silky <strong>Shark</strong> (Carcharh<strong>in</strong>us falciformis).<br />

The data for each of the three species re<strong>in</strong>force the pattern <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />

by observer data which is that sharks are mostly alive when hauled<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> mostly dead when discarded. This is contradicted by the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terview results which state that the sharks are almost always dead<br />

when hauled to the boat.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>terviews with fishermen also gave different results for the most<br />

commonly caught sharks. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>terviews with fishermen<br />

that only fish <strong>in</strong> Fiji Waters, sharks that are typically caught are:<br />

Makos, Brown <strong>Shark</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Blue <strong>Shark</strong>s. One <strong>in</strong>terviewee <strong>in</strong>dicated<br />

that Brown <strong>and</strong> Blue sharks are the most destructive to their target<br />

catch, the rest of the <strong>in</strong>terviewees were not sure. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />

<strong>in</strong>terviewees, sharks are caught at a rate of roughly one to two sharks<br />

per set (2300 to 2500 hooks).<br />

One <strong>in</strong>terviewee commented that due to the fact that the length of<br />

their fish<strong>in</strong>g trips are limited to around 9 days due to ice supplies<br />

they catch fewer sharks than Ch<strong>in</strong>ese <strong>and</strong> Japanese longl<strong>in</strong>ers which<br />

can stay are sea for much longer periods of time.<br />

Table A3.2. Target Species (Tuna – Albacore, Bigeye, Yellowf<strong>in</strong>), <strong>Shark</strong>s <strong>and</strong><br />

“Other” observed catch, Fiji <strong>Pelagic</strong> Longl<strong>in</strong>e Tuna Fishery Catch Data, 1999<br />

<strong>and</strong> 2002-2005, for all fish caught regardless of whether reta<strong>in</strong>ed or<br />

discarded. Source: SPC Observer Programme Data.<br />

1999<br />

No. /100 hooks % Kg/100 Hooks %<br />

Tuna 1.756 49 33.473 46<br />

<strong>Shark</strong>s 0.3581 10 17.9829 25<br />

Other 1.4837 41 21.0125 29<br />

Total 3.5978 72.4684<br />

2002<br />

No. /100 hooks % Kg/100 Hooks %<br />

Tuna 1.803 54 32.03 67<br />

<strong>Shark</strong>s 0.0885 3 3.8017 8<br />

Other 1.4646 44 12.236 25<br />

Total 3.3561 48.0677<br />

2003<br />

No. /100 hooks % Kg/100 Hooks %<br />

Tuna 1.323 62 24.414 62<br />

<strong>Shark</strong>s 0.0819 4 4.3062 11<br />

Other 0.7346 34 10.392 27<br />

Total 2.1395 39.1122<br />

2004<br />

No. /100 hooks % Kg/100 Hooks %<br />

Tuna 1.774 74 30.487 72<br />

<strong>Shark</strong>s 0.1463 6 5.8829 14<br />

Other 0.4633 19 6.2142 15<br />

Total 2.3836 42.5841<br />

2005<br />

No. /100 hooks % Kg/100 Hooks %<br />

Tuna 1.916 72 33.461 73<br />

<strong>Shark</strong>s 0.1072 4 4.7502 10<br />

Other 0.6489 24 7.6622 17<br />

Total 2.6721 45.8734<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!