Review - Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bibliography Australian Qualifications Framework Council, www.aqf.edu.au/aqfqual.htm AS/NZS ISO 9000:2006: Quality management systems—fundamentals and vocabulary, Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. Bradley D, Noonan P, Nugent H, Scales B, 2008, Review of Australian higher education: final report, Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Burke G, McKenzie P, Shah C, Keating J, Vickers A, Fearnside R & Bateman A, 2009, Mapping qualifications frameworks across APEC economies: prepared for Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), APEC. Canadian Information Centre for International Credentials, www.cicic.ca/421/an-overview.canada CEDEFOP 2006b, National VET systems thematic analysis, Germany, www.trainingvillage.gr/etv/Information, accessed 5:11:06. City & Guilds, 2008, Providing City & Guilds qualifications: a guide to centre and qualification approval, London. Commission of the European Communities, 2008, Proposal for a recommendation of the European Parliament and of the council on the establishment of a European quality assurance reference framework for vocational education and training. Cooper L, Bateman A, Moran L & Eccles C, 2005, Improving practice and national consistency in quality assurance mechanisms for offshore delivery of education and training: final report, Department of Education, Science and Technology, Canberra. Cuddy N and Leney T, 2005, Vocational education and training in the United Kingdom, CEDEFOP Panorama, Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Department of Education, Science and Training, 2007, AQTF 2007 Essential Standards for Registration, Canberra. Deutscher Qualifikationsrahmen, 2008, Discussion proposal for a German qualifications framework for lifelong learning, European Commission, 2005 (updated version of 29/09/05), Fundamentals of a ‘common quality assurance framework’ (CQAF) for VET in Europe. Hueglin Thomas O, and Fenna Alan, 2005, Comparative federalism, Quebec City, Broadview Press. Foster Andrew, 2006 Realising the potential—a review of the role of further education colleges, Nottinghamshire, Department for Education and Skills. Gan Kim Yong (chair), 2006, Report of the Singapore Polytechnic committee, Singapore, Department of Education. Green Andy, 1990, Education and state formation, London, Macmillan. Keating Jack, 2009, A new federalism for Australian schooling, Foundation for Young Australians, (forthcoming). Keating J, Bateman A, Noonan P, James R, Coles M, Dow Kwong Lee, Simmons V, Meek L & Clarke K, 2008, Enhancing the AQF: Report to the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Kuruvilla Sarosh, Erickson Christopher L, and Hwang Alvin, 2002, ‘An assessment of the Singapore skills development system: does it constitute a viable model for other developing countries?’ World development, Vol.30, No.8, p.1461–1476. Leitch Sandy, 2006, Prosperity for all in the global economy—world class skills, London, Her Majesty’s Stationary Service. Comparisons of international quality assurance in vocational education and training Page 54 of 115
Leney Tom, May Tom, Hayward Geoff, and Wilde Stephanie, 2007, International Comparisons in Further Education, London, Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. Lohmar, Brigtitte and Eckhardt, Thomas, 2008, The Education System in the Federal Republic of Germany, Brussels, Eurydice. Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities, www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/tcu/ Moodie G, 2008, From vocational to higher education: An international perspective, Open University Press, England. New Zealand Qualifications Authority, www.nzqa.govt.nz/ New Zealand Qualifications Authority, 2003, Criteria, requirements and guidelines for course approval and accreditation, Wellington, www.nzqa.govt.nz/for-providers/aaa/docs/caaguidelinespdf.pdf New Zealand Qualifications Authority, 2005, The New Zealand National Qualifications Framework, www.nzqa.govt.nz/news/featuresandspeeches/docs/nqf-background.pdf New Zealand Qualifications Authority, 2007, The New Zealand register of quality assured qualifications policy, Wellington, www.kiwiquals.govt.nz/publications/docs/theregisterbooklet.pdf New Zealand Qualifications Authority, 2008, Evaluative approach to quality assurance for tertiary education organisations, Wellington, www.nzqa.govt.nz/for-providers/tertiary/docs/evalapproach-to-qa.pdf OECD, 2006, Qualifications systems: bridges to lifelong learning. The role of national qualifications systems in promoting lifelong learning, OECD, 2008 Education at a Glance, Paris. Ofsted, 2008, Handbook for inspecting colleges, London, www.ofsted.gov.uk/Ofsted-home/Formsand-guidance/Browse-all-by/Other/General/Handbook-for-inspecting-colleges Ontario College Quality Assurance Service, 2008, Program quality assurance process audit (PQAPA): orientation manual, Toronto, www.ocqas.org/pdf/PQAPA%20Manual%20- %20Revised%20Novembe%2008.pdf Orton Larry, Statistics Canada’s definition and classification of postsecondary and adult education providers in Canada, Statistics Canada, Culture, Tourism and the Centre for Education Statistics Division, Ottawa, www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/81-595-m/81-595-m2009071-eng.pdf Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, 2004, The statutory regulation of external qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, www.ofqual.gov.uk/487.aspx Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, 2006, NVQ Code of Practice, London. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, 2007, Regulatory monitoring and reporting, London. Scottish Qualifications Authority 2000, Guide to approval for training providers and employers, Glasgow. Scottish Qualifications Authority, 2005, Guidance for UK-based centres on providing SQA qualifications overseas, Glasgow, www.sqa.org.uk/files_ccc/Guidance_for_UKbased_centres_on_providing_SQA_qualifications_overseas_WEB.pdf Scottish Qualifications Authority, 2006, SQA’s qualifications development strategy, www.sqa.org.uk/files_ccc/QualificationsDevelopmentStrategy2006.pdf Scottish Qualifications Authority, 2007, Authority awarding body criteria, Glasgow, www.sqa.org.uk/sqa/files_ccc/AccreditationAwardingBodyCriteria.pdf Scottish Qualifications Authority, 2007, Verification visits: a guide for colleges, employers and training providers, Glasgow, www.sqa.org.uk/files_ccc/VerificationVisitsCentreGuideFeb07.pdf Comparisons of international quality assurance in vocational education and training Page 55 of 115
Page 1 and 2:
Attachment A Comparisons of Interna
Page 3 and 4: Acknowledgements The project team w
Page 5 and 6: Executive summary Project purposes
Page 7 and 8: Course and qualifications accredita
Page 9 and 10: Any comments related to the evaluat
Page 11 and 12: Context: what influences the nature
Page 13 and 14: Systems The characteristics of thes
Page 15 and 16: o quality improvement—linking the
Page 17 and 18: As well each of the countries has d
Page 19 and 20: Table 1: Context summary Constituti
Page 21 and 22: Although the German federal governm
Page 23 and 24: There has been a strong emphasis on
Page 25 and 26: A consultation paper has been relea
Page 27 and 28: Qualifications and competency units
Page 29 and 30: Regulatory monitoring and reporting
Page 31 and 32: • financials • protection of st
Page 33 and 34: For Singapore, approval criteria co
Page 35 and 36: In Ontario’s private career colle
Page 37 and 38: • competency standards and curric
Page 39 and 40: Development and Design. This criter
Page 41 and 42: • NZQA notifies and publishes out
Page 43 and 44: The Regulatory monitoring and repor
Page 45 and 46: In Scotland, the emphasis on intern
Page 47 and 48: As this report was being prepared,
Page 49 and 50: For private providers in Ontario, t
Page 51 and 52: Implications A review of the variou
Page 53: small degree of state supplementati
Page 57 and 58: Glossary ACE AMAP APEC APS AQF AQTF
Page 59 and 60: Appendix 1: The European Quality As
Page 61 and 62: Quality criteria Indicative descrip
Page 63 and 64: Indicator Type of indicator Policy
Page 65 and 66: Indicator Type of indicator Policy
Page 67 and 68: Training organisations • AQTF 200
Page 69 and 70: Appendix 3: Canada, Ontario Canada
Page 71 and 72: local college board of governors, m
Page 73 and 74: Quality assurance approach Ontario
Page 75 and 76: Ontario—private sector Overview A
Page 77 and 78: Or • have 48 months of occupation
Page 79 and 80: oad consultation. These replace key
Page 81 and 82: orders to colleges that are not con
Page 83 and 84: Comment Ontario participates in the
Page 85 and 86: ones: • The tasks of the Federal
Page 87 and 88: Overall, the system defines norms t
Page 89 and 90: drive the results, well-developed e
Page 91 and 92: Appendix 5: New Zealand Overview Th
Page 93 and 94: Key aspects of QAS1 include: Defini
Page 95 and 96: National Qualifications Framework a
Page 97 and 98: Institute for technology and polyte
Page 99 and 100: Appendix 6: Singapore Overview In S
Page 101 and 102: Quality assurance approach on a reg
Page 103 and 104: Appendix 7: United Kingdom England,
Page 105 and 106:
• corporate governance • admini
Page 107 and 108:
These standards are regulatory. Qua
Page 109 and 110:
The website (which is relatively ne
Page 111 and 112:
egard to policy that this generates
Page 113 and 114:
training needs. It defines standard
Page 115:
changes to UK regulatory practice a
show all

Review - Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?