16.03.2014 Views

no. b-000119-c melinda matthews, individually ) in the district court ...

no. b-000119-c melinda matthews, individually ) in the district court ...

no. b-000119-c melinda matthews, individually ) in the district court ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

143<br />

1 Strickland Drive Dairy Queen's playground to be <strong>in</strong><br />

2 compliance with <strong>the</strong> CPSC before it would allow a<br />

3 transfer of <strong>the</strong> Strickland Drive Dairy Queen franchise,<br />

4 does that mean it could require <strong>the</strong> Strickland Drive<br />

5 Dairy Queen playground be <strong>in</strong> compliance with <strong>the</strong> CPSC or<br />

6 default it?<br />

7 MR. LIGHTY: Objection. Form.<br />

8 A Not necessarily, <strong>no</strong>t necessarily.<br />

9 Q And why?<br />

10 A I would have to see <strong>the</strong> document that -- There<br />

11 could be an addendum.<br />

12 Q If <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>no</strong> addendum?<br />

13 A I just -- It is too hypo<strong>the</strong>tical for me.<br />

14 Q It is too hypo<strong>the</strong>tical under <strong>the</strong> documents you<br />

15 have looked at, right?<br />

16 A Yes.<br />

17 Q Okay. Did you k<strong>no</strong>w that <strong>the</strong> Strickland Drive<br />

18 Dairy Queen premises was transferred to Anita Wilson at<br />

19 one po<strong>in</strong>t?<br />

20 A By?<br />

21 Q Just did you k<strong>no</strong>w it was transferred to her?<br />

22 A Well, that sounds as if it is a completed,<br />

23 agreed to transaction by all parties. I k<strong>no</strong>w that she<br />

24 had thought it was.<br />

25 Q Okay. But <strong>in</strong> your op<strong>in</strong>ion it wasn't?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!