16.03.2014 Views

no. b-000119-c melinda matthews, individually ) in the district court ...

no. b-000119-c melinda matthews, individually ) in the district court ...

no. b-000119-c melinda matthews, individually ) in the district court ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

259<br />

1 A Personal meet<strong>in</strong>gs would have been helpful.<br />

2 Q Yeah.<br />

3 Between franchisees and franchisors, how<br />

4 many franchisors are <strong>the</strong>re <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States?<br />

5 A My best guesstimate is about 5,000.<br />

6 Q Are all <strong>the</strong> franchisor-franchisee<br />

7 relationships exactly <strong>the</strong> same?<br />

8 A No.<br />

9 Q Are any of <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r franchisee-franchisor<br />

10 relationships exactly <strong>the</strong> same as ADQ's?<br />

11 A I can't answer that.<br />

12 Q Can you tell me of one that is?<br />

13 A I wasn't asked to prepare that comparison.<br />

14 MR. LAWDERMILK: Objection.<br />

15 Nonresponsive.<br />

16 Q (By Mr. Lawdermilk) Can you tell me one<br />

17 franchisee-franchisor relationship that is exactly <strong>the</strong><br />

18 same as ADQ's?<br />

19 A Not at this moment.<br />

20 Q And you have never worked beyond a couple of<br />

21 sem<strong>in</strong>ars 20 years ago and be<strong>in</strong>g hired for this case by<br />

22 ADQ before, have you?<br />

23 A I have <strong>no</strong>t.<br />

24 Q And you discussed at length<br />

25 franchisor-franchisee relationships <strong>in</strong> general, correct?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!