no. b-000119-c melinda matthews, individually ) in the district court ...

55
1 subsets below it, right?
2 A The particular entity operated under license
3 agreements for individual restaurants as well as issued
4 them.
5 Q But the bottom line was that Hooters didn't
6 feel that the people they had given their licensing
7 agreement to were living up to their standards - to the
8 Hooters standards, right?
9 A The master license agreement, right. Yes.
10 True.
11 Q And because of that, Hooters wanted to revoke
12 that master licensing agreement, right?
13 A Yes.
14 Q And who won that case?
15 A Ah. That case ended up with the master
16 licensee buying the franchisor company.
17 Q Did it go to trial?
18 A No.
19 Q So, was that sort of a settlement?
20 A I suppose it was -- Yeah, that's a good term -
21 sort of a settlement.
22 Q Did you testify in that case?
23 A It didn't go to trial.
24 Q Did you give a deposition?
25 A No.